HI xtatic,
For rescue, I trust SAR. They are the experts. All of the SAR folks I have talked to, and I've talked to a few, STRONGLY favor PLB's. Jeez, I'm not making this stuff up. I still maintain that ham radio is basically entertainment that may (or may not) have some use for emergency rescue. If ham works in a given case, you are lucky. The PLB systems removes luck from the equation. There is no place for luck in an emergency situation.
In all cases, even with PLB's, we are playing the odds. So, I see the best system is one that maximizes the odds for a successful and timely rescue. All data I have seen points to PLB's as the best odds breaker. If you wish to argue with the historical data, it is your choice.
Somehow, a complete mystery to me, some folks seem to think this is narrow minded. I suspect these same folks would say the same thing about people who with great fervor tout seat belts as a lifesaver and not back down from this position. But, I know some folks would argue all day long that they would not use seat belts. Again, this argument is a complete mystery to me. I will not resort to name calling because this has been a relatively civil thread. But you can imagine what I am thinking.
Sparky
For rescue, I trust SAR. They are the experts. All of the SAR folks I have talked to, and I've talked to a few, STRONGLY favor PLB's. Jeez, I'm not making this stuff up. I still maintain that ham radio is basically entertainment that may (or may not) have some use for emergency rescue. If ham works in a given case, you are lucky. The PLB systems removes luck from the equation. There is no place for luck in an emergency situation.
In all cases, even with PLB's, we are playing the odds. So, I see the best system is one that maximizes the odds for a successful and timely rescue. All data I have seen points to PLB's as the best odds breaker. If you wish to argue with the historical data, it is your choice.
Somehow, a complete mystery to me, some folks seem to think this is narrow minded. I suspect these same folks would say the same thing about people who with great fervor tout seat belts as a lifesaver and not back down from this position. But, I know some folks would argue all day long that they would not use seat belts. Again, this argument is a complete mystery to me. I will not resort to name calling because this has been a relatively civil thread. But you can imagine what I am thinking.
Sparky
Last edited: