MOAK
Adventurer
I’ll be building out the rear seat area for stowing camera gear, laptops, hiking gear; a small Engle fridge, along with a 17 gallon water tank. Yes, just my wife & I, and yes, we’ve been on multiple month trips. It’s time to retire the 80 series, the tents and all the gear that goes with it as we plan on full time till we are in our mid-70s and seek the luxury of a poor man’s expedition truck. The 450, in my humble opinion, formulated after nearly 40 years of being in the transportation business, is way too much truck, with a payload over 5,000 lbs) for what we are doing. By the time the vehicle is paid for ( 68-72k ) and all the modifications would be done, in order to support things such as fuel needs, (range) we would be way over our cash & carry budget constraints. I appreciate your outlook, but after 40 years of driving trucks of all shapes and sizes, Ford Rangers to 18 wheelers, I’m done with diesels and large trucks in general, especially the modern diesels that ford cannot seem to get right. Thanks again for causing me to do even more research. We are going into this entire arena with our eyes wide open.What will you use the back seat for? Are there just the two of you? Are you and your wife experienced at long camping trips?
I've posted here before about going with a F450 rather than 350. The main benefits are a much smaller turning radius (which helps a lot with maneuvering), higher payload (not that much though), more large tire options, lower gear ratios possible (I think), and more options for wheelbase. Ideally a custom articulated bed with integrated storage would be the way to go. I'd opt for standard rather than military tires, which would limit the rear axle to 8k lbs, but you could get military if you wanted more.
If you wanted a custom bed anyway, the cost increase isn't much. The F450 bed would need to articulate though (because it's C channel frame), while the 350 would not.