There is big and then there is gigantic. Money and ego certainly play a significant role in our choice of toys, but that aside, we could limit the vehicle to 25K and there could be a choice between a duce and a half with a custom box or a tricked out '99 F-250 or an 06 AWD Volvo wagon. In other words, the size of vehicle, not the price.
Great points made and I have recently made a choice going for economy, a small Forester giving more thought to longer touring and overlanding only to realize the limitations of my choice. A trailer is now necessary if there is any extended camping to be done. Then comes the weight limitations vs. the gear to take for a comfortable experience. I really like the Subbie as the DD, but I see the limtations clearly now. My situation is now figuring out how to maximize comfort with those capacity restrictions.
I suppose, excluding the initial cost of the vehicle as they could be about the same
the two main considerations pointed out here are the cost of operations and the extent of crew and equipment (comfort) required. Also is the expected terrain and routes to be covered and the range involved. A vehicle has to be big enough to carry the provisions and cover the terrain, but no bigger.
My garage is limited as well as a budget for this venture. If I had unlimited resources I would probably have several capable vehicles to fit the needs of any expeditionary goal, but that is not the real world for most. Finding a balance is key, a vehicle that meets most of what may be accomplished, the choices not taken is the cost of missed opportunities.
I'm sure many think I'm pounding away at a dead topic, but for those considering overlanding for pleasure it's hard to make a great choice from the start. I'll bet most have made many purchases, owned all kinds of equipment and have ended up with their choices from trail trial and error at a greater expense than if they could have identified the right fit to begin with. I'd bet too that I'm not the only one who has added overlanding to their bucket list and needs guidance from those who have been there and done that.
I'm a business type who looks at most everything from a break-even and profit or advantage angle. There is a point where a vehicle choice becomes bigger than what is really required and going beyond that point provides deminishing returns in terms of money as an additional cost of operations. If money is barely a consideration, the larger units may contribute to other joys in life. Sorry for such a long post.:coffeedrink: