Outdated? For sure. Overpriced? It's the cheapest full-size truck and holds its value the best. Junk? You're funny.
Dashboard Light's overall quality rating index has the Tundra at an exceptional 96/100. The F-series overall rating is 40/100.
If you look at 2015-2019 only, the F-series does much better at 87.6/100. There should be a caveat with that as Dashboard Light looks at
long term quality and reliability...just how much
long term data do we have for trucks that are ≤ 4 years old?
If you don't mind 15mpg combined and don't need all of the new features, the Tundra makes the most sense, especially if you're going to be going out in the middle of nowhere and want to be able to come back every time. I know there are people on here who take their F-150s out and come back no problem, but the aggregate data does not lie. The Tundra is simply more reliable. Period. And yes, that comes from it being an older design with less bells and whistles. But it is ridiculous to call it "junk".
Do any of you who rag on the Tundra for having no rear locker have any experience driving Toyota's ATRAC system? It's incredible what that can get you out of. Stock Tundras have successfully tackled Hell's Revenge in Moab. My 4Runner's ATRAC has gotten me through lots of hairy off-road situations...mud, sand, steep inclines, etc. with ease. Turn it on in 4Lo, and away you go. If you still want a locker, maybe you can spend a little of the $10k you saved on a Tundra on an ARB setup.
I say all this, and I like the F150. My father in law has a 2016 EB, and so far it's a great workhorse of a truck. But, for exploring remote trails and places well outside of cell service, I would choose instead to rely on the severely outdated, thirsty, feature-poor Tundra.