Favorite lenses?

cruiser guy

Explorer
DaveInDenver said:
Regular issue true rangefinder XA. Mine has the A11 flash, but it doesn't work, and the original plastic box. The only thing I don't like about the camera is that it only allows film speeds up to ASA800. Since there is no way to bypass the AE, this can be a limitation. But I really do like the little sucker!

Mine has the A11 flash too and it does work:)

I've never found the ASA limitation to be an issue but then I always preferred the slower films anyways.
 

cruiser guy

Explorer
XJxplorer said:
What would be a great all around lens for that camera? I have a limit of about $700...

You need to know what kind of shooting she'll be doing. If it's primarily landscapes and people I'd probably go with the wider lens. Sports or wildlife of course need a telephoto.
 

dhackney

Expedition Leader
Utilization: traveling photography (which relies on whatever is there, as opposed to professional travel photography, where you stage as much as is required to get the shot)

Usage: non-professional

Locations: primarily 3rd world, developing economies, rural and non-populated areas

Subjects: culture, anthropology, wildlife, landscape, architectural, interior

Transportation platforms: 2-up motorcycle, sailboat, overland expedition vehicle

Brand: Canon. When I came back into serious shooting after a 20 year hiatus I sampled Nikon and Canon. I liked the Canon pro glass better. I didn't choose based on bodies because I consider them as temporary as laptops in the digital photography era.

Background: Former commercial pro shooter, primarily print, subjects ranging from jewelry to fashion to commercial trucks and everything in between. Used the usual suspects (Sinar, Linhoff, Haselbladd, Leica & Nikon) in that era.

Standard travel bag lenses:
Canon 28-300 f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM – This is the photojournalist (PJ) lens that I rely on as my primary travel glass. Big surprise for me that I ended up with this, as I shot all fast prime lenses as a pro. Very versatile lens well suited to the adaptability required for true traveling photography.

I also carry the 16-35 f/2.8 L USM (series I ) and the 24-70 f/2.8 L USM in my travel bag, but rarely use them in comparison.


28-300 Upsides:

  • 11:1 zoom ratio – this is the strongest feature, allows you to cover a dynamic scene from many perspectives without swapping glass
  • L class materials and construction
  • Rugged
  • Weatherproof
  • Sharp, especially for its zoom range


Downsides:

  • Slow, mitigated by the IS
  • Dust pumper design guarantees annual trips to service depot for cleaning & calibration
  • Heavy, but helps build arm strength


Other lenses in the inventory:
Canon F2.8 100mm Macro (when the sun is high, go small)
Canon F2.8 70-200mm L IS (good for interior candid settings)
Canon F4.5-5.6 100-400mm L IS (thought I would use a lot and don't)

I also carry the 1.4 & 2x extenders if I have suitable lenses along.


Note the buff arm developed from a year of lugging the 1D MkII and the 28-300 around:
image120.jpg

Simatai Great Wall, China. Photo by Stephanie Hackney

If you are looking for a much lighter, unobtrusive and compact package the 30D (or the new 40D) and the Canon F3.5-5.6 28-135 IS makes a fantastic package for travel and everyday use. The lens mechanical action won't compare favorably with an L lens, but it makes decent shots.

And yes, I still miss the Leicas and their amazing glass.

Doug
 

esh

Explorer
Doug,

Thanks for the depth of info. I was not aware of the 28-300's existence. Seems like it may be money better spent than a new body.

Cheers!
 

norseman

New member
Lenses I really like using

Most of my photography is wildlife and landscape, but I am also interested in architectural and candid portraiture so I often carry a large assortment of gear when out.

Transport is shanks' pony, Opel Vectra estate, Unimog 1450L DoKa with rotating roof turret. ( I am giving some thought to adding either a 10 metre or perhaps a 15 metre camera mast too)

I use Canon EOS 1Ds Mk2 bodies at present so full frame sensors.

If I only have one body with me it usually has the Canon L 28 - 300 mm lens mounted, like Doug I find its versatility so useful.

2 bodies with me then one will usually have my Canon L 14 mm super wide (great for the wide landscapes) and the other with Canon L 100 - 400 mm generally with 1.4x converter (I live by the sea and it is often difficult to get close approach to much of the wildlife and this is a comparatively light rig)

Other lenses that I like using for different reasons are:-
Canon f2.8 15 mm fisheye because I sometimes like 'funky'
Canon L f2.8 17 - 35 mm for general landscape
Canon L f3.5 24 mm tilt and shift is great for architectural stuff in tight locations and also for interiors (OK I know all about geometric correction in Photoshop but it saves a heap of time to do it with the lens)
Canon MP-E f2.8 65 mm macro 1 - 5x is so nice for those small flowers
Canon L f3.5 180 mm macro - great for insects when you can't make a close approach
Canon L f1.2 85 mm Mk2 what a fabulous portrait lens
Canon L f4 500 mm IS great because it is so much lighter than the f4 600 mm and is great for distant action and wildlife too
Canon L f4 600 mm just a fabulous optic and I am at present unable to justify upgrading to the IS version (it is such a heavy piece of kit to lug though)

What would I like to have that is not already there? Canon L f1.2 50 mm and man if I could afford it I would love to own the Canon L f5.6 1200 mm that is made to order.

As tripods are often intrinsic to good image capture I use Vinten Broadcast 'Vision3' head and carbon fibre legs - they may be expensive but if you get to look at these you will understand why, also your image is often only as good as a solid camera mount allows.

best regards from David Gudmunsen
 

Robthebrit

Explorer
I am with Doug, the Canon 28-300 f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM is a very versatile piece of glass, it has the advantage of a wide range without having to change the lens so your sensor stays clean and you don't have to carry as much stuff. If you don't have a full size sensor then its range may not be as useful. The quality is really good but its not as sharp as the narrower ranged L's such as the 24-70 2.8 L.


Rob
 

Railvan

Adventurer
jeffryscott said:
the Canon 17-40 4 L is an exceptional lens. It is within your price also, as is the 70-200 4 L. I had these, now have the 2.8 versions and prefer the 4's.

Either would be fantastic, it just depends on whether she wants wide to normal, or telephoto.

Good luck and how nice of you.


Why do you prefer the F4 over the F2.8? I am about to buy Canon lenses so any feedback on this is helpful. I am planning on the 24-70 F2.8L, 70-200 F2.8L IS, 300 F4L, and the 1.4 extender.

Brian Rutherford
 

esh

Explorer
It could be he has a very sharp copy of the f/4.. Mine is exceptional.

The only other f/4 advantages I can think of are lighter weight and smaller diameter (cost of filters). I wish I would have saved for a 2.8.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,436
Messages
2,904,835
Members
230,359
Latest member
TNielson-18
Top