My son has a 97 and he's getting ready to buy a set of Icon extended travel C/Os for the front paired with Camburg UCAs, and the Icon piggyback shocks for the rear. How did you like the OME 890 coils in the rear? Were they a good match to the rest of the Icon stuff? How much lift did you have to adjust the front C/Os to to level it out with the rear? I hadn't seen the adjustable caps for the resi's yet, pretty slick. He's having a hard time justifying the remote resi's for the front cost-wise but it seems dumb to have the piggyback resi's out back and not have them up front.
Funny you should ask, I have been searching for an alternative to the 890's for a while. Short story; very firm (never harsh), great load carrying capacity, lots of lift (3.5-4.5" in the back).
Long story: Original plan was for an even 2" lift all around with a little bit extra of load carrying capacity, so I ordered the 906 coils for the rear. Come to find out the 906s free hight is actually shorter than the factory springs, and because of the increased travel of the Icons, they could fall out on full droop. That prompted me to move up to the 890s.
I have been rocking this combo for about 2 years, but honestly I'm not a huge fan. The truck originally gained 5+ inches over stock (probably worn) coils, and now it is settled to about 3.5-4.5. I measured it today at 24.5" from hub center to fender lip, according to the internet the 99 tall coils sit about 21", so 3.5 to 4.5" lift depending on which stock coils you have. It rides ok, but it's pretty firm and bucks a bit when I'm really driving hard. The problem is, the Icon's are charged w/ 250PSI, so they actually firm up the ride and provide some lift on their own. I'm sure the 890s with OME shocks are a great combo, but at least for my ride, it's too much. How much weight is planning on running? My CBI bumper adds about 40lbs, but even loaded down with people and gear it still sits ***-high. I think you would need a pretty portly truck for this combo. I believe CiY5 on here had the Icon/890 combo and has since moved up to an 891 for load carrying, maybe I got a set of 891s mislabeled? I will have to measure them sometime to confirm.
That being said, I have zero complaints and no regrets purchasing the Icons, you just can't seem to phase them. I would really like to drop the truck to 1-2" above stock, which means 99 coils (to soft?) or a custom coil. I will eventually add a bit more weight to the truck (sliders and maybe a sleeping platform) but I like to keep it light so I'm not sure if that will be enough. I never adjusted the front up to match for fear of tearing my CV boots, but they went anyways last summer. I'm guessing the front gained about 2.5" since I don't have any additional weight, but I lost my measurement numbers a while ago.
I would call Icon and talk to them. When I had the issue with the 906 coils they said the shocks were designed for use with stock coils, and I'm betting for a lighter rig, fresh 99 coils will work very well. You have to push the front pretty hard to justify the resi's. My only reason for upgrading is to get the compression adjusters, otherwise it's more of a nice to have vs. a need. Hopefully this was a helpful blurb.
Picture of 890, 906, & 135k '96 springs for reference.
