Littlehouse
Adventurer
I don't know, it looks pretty damn good to me. N/A V8, 10 speed, Dual Lockers, etc.
I wish all the truck makers would stop with the front ends that are like 5' tall. Just about any modern fullsize in offroad trim (even factory "barely-a-lift" trim) is like chest-high or above on me. It's rediculous.I wish Chevy would stop with the front ends that are 95% grill.
I don't know, it looks pretty damn good to me. N/A V8, 10 speed, Dual Lockers, etc.
I wish Chevy would stop with the front ends that are 95% grill. Used to be a GM guy.... but damn.... Maybe GMC will come out with a version that's a little better looking.
Personally, I'd probably pick an F150 Tremor or a Rebel over this if looking for a half ton off-roady truck.... And I say this as someone that has owned near 30 GM vehicles in my life.
so what you're saying is you would rather have an ugly utilitarian truck.good for you.some of us spend alot of time in our top of the line trucks,and in -40c i like my heated steering and heated seats,not to mention the a/c seats in the summer.to each his own.Yeah this isn't a "Tremor Fighter", that was already covered by the Trailboss and AT4, this is their Raptor/TRX competitor but in a different, more utilitarian route (more fire roads and back country than baja).
So what you are saying is you would get the wrong truck just because the right truck doesn't look good? That is what I hear from the suburban dad crowd that doesn't actually leave the pavement/have a use for a truck, they just want what looks the "coolest". Never understood that, especially for a truck, I give two licks what it looks like, is it the best tool for the job at the best price and most reliable. All these people that shop based on what fancy interior it has and how it looks is the demographic that is sadly driving truck design and sales lately and which in turns drives up the cost for those that actually need and use trucks (it is the reason we have massaging seats and base models cost 30k or more, the development cost of those features have to get passed down). I have heard people say they won't buy a vehicle because it doesn't have X feature like LED lights or pushbutton start, like really? That is the key feature that is driving the decision, not the engine output, capabilities, layout, ride/handling, etc? SMH
Tyler
I blame it on USian toxic masculinity.
Yeah this isn't a "Tremor Fighter", that was already covered by the Trailboss and AT4, this is their Raptor/TRX competitor but in a different, more utilitarian route (more fire roads and back country than baja).
So what you are saying is you would get the wrong truck just because the right truck doesn't look good? That is what I hear from the suburban dad crowd that doesn't actually leave the pavement/have a use for a truck, they just want what looks the "coolest". Never understood that, especially for a truck, I give two licks what it looks like, is it the best tool for the job at the best price and most reliable. All these people that shop based on what fancy interior it has and how it looks is the demographic that is sadly driving truck design and sales lately and which in turns drives up the cost for those that actually need and use trucks (it is the reason we have massaging seats and base models cost 30k or more, the development cost of those features have to get passed down). I have heard people say they won't buy a vehicle because it doesn't have X feature like LED lights or pushbutton start, like really? That is the key feature that is driving the decision, not the engine output, capabilities, layout, ride/handling, etc? SMH
Tyler
Problem is, it better not be more than $60k. Because for a little but more I would be in a lower trim Raptor or TRX before this.
Yeah this isn't a "Tremor Fighter", that was already covered by the Trailboss and AT4, this is their Raptor/TRX competitor but in a different, more utilitarian route (more fire roads and back country than baja).
So what you are saying is you would get the wrong truck just because the right truck doesn't look good? That is what I hear from the suburban dad crowd that doesn't actually leave the pavement/have a use for a truck, they just want what looks the "coolest". Never understood that, especially for a truck, I give two licks what it looks like, is it the best tool for the job at the best price and most reliable. All these people that shop based on what fancy interior it has and how it looks is the demographic that is sadly driving truck design and sales lately and which in turns drives up the cost for those that actually need and use trucks (it is the reason we have massaging seats and base models cost 30k or more, the development cost of those features have to get passed down). I have heard people say they won't buy a vehicle because it doesn't have X feature like LED lights or pushbutton start, like really? That is the key feature that is driving the decision, not the engine output, capabilities, layout, ride/handling, etc? SMH
Tyler