Is this the prior art principle you mention:
The existence of "prior art" can be a roadblock to obtaining a patent. What exactly is "prior art" and how can you overcome it in order to secure your patent?
www.nolo.com
, the prohibition on prior art is not limited to merely existing
patents; rather, it includes any written description or patent anywhere in the world. If the proposed invention is already the subject of a patent in another country, that precludes the issuance of a patent in the United States. Moreover, if the proposed invention is described in a written publication anywhere in the world (even if it is not formally patented), this still precludes the issuance of a patent in the United States.
Nice camper, agree this will definitely shake up the pop top market
This is a crapy article to be direct and is wildly over simplifying intellectual property (IP) and the patent system here in the USA, let alone internationally. If you are going to talk about international patenting, forget about it. What GLOBAL data base are US patent attorneys going to check? What company, entity, country, or government is responsible for compiling such a unique data base from everyone on the planet? Who funds those efforts? How often is it updated? There are a numerous patent categories, so are there global data bases for each? These are retorical questions, as such a GLOBAL data base does not exists.
When filing a patent the US attorney's don’t say “hey, lets check the patent or IP data base of Ghana or Transylvania to be really really sure!” What a stupid notion.
Also for these “other people with drawings, ideas, written descriptions, or even prototypes,” what have they done to secure their patents? Here in the USA you have to pay fees and keep your patent current for anything infringements to be enforceable. Also, what makes something “enforceable“ here would mean squat elsewhere. The rabbit hole of “enforceable“ is deeeeeeeep. The most important point of “enforceability” is that its only as strong as the persons bank account who is pursuing the issue.
I cant tell if your post to
@HiatusCampers is a passive aggressive one to be honest. You posted an article that‘s filled with, at best, over simplied information, and at worst, total miss-information that’s alluding to a legal threat for them. I am going to air on the side of caution here and assume you are humbly sharing information with no other intent.
I want to be clear & transparent about something, I don‘t like trolls.
@HiatusCampers are honest great people who are working WELL within their legal rights. They are hard working folks. They are good people. Count on me stepping in every time the subject comes up or if someone is trying to “pull the wool.“