nwoods
Expedition Leader
Thanks for the feedback abruzzi. Interesting about Pixelmator. I've been looking at it a lot these past few months, but never pulled the trigger. I think I'd like Aperature also, but it doesn't seem like Apple is continuing to develop it anymore. Its past due for an update, and there are a lot more features that could be built into it if they were to continue with it. It seems to me that Apple is losing focus on professional grade software and looking more actively at the consumer instead. I get the ecconomics, but its contrary to the appreciation Jobs always expressed to loyal Mac users who single handily kept Apple afloat in the 90's.
I have spent a lot of time researching and evaluating my options, what accessories I would need to accompany a new platform (like some USB 3.0 card readers!), as well as software transition costs. I did a spreadsheet comparison between 6 different platforms:
1. Traditional 13" MBP
2. Retina 13" MBP
3. Traditional 15" MBP
4. Retina 15" MBP
5. Refurb 15" MBP (2011 model)
6. DELL 15" XPS with Windows 7
Here is a link to the spreadsheet:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w0tpf0kg6104zpp/Computer Options.xlsx
The Dell was cheapest overall because I could reuse my software, but the machine itself was only marginally more affordable than a good refurb or baseline modern MBP.
Ultimately, I've been wanting to migrate to a Mac for years, and I've decided that its now or never.
After a lot of additional consideration, I have determined that while the 13" is the most desirable form factor, the lack of a quad core processor and discrete GPU will be very noticeable in how I intend to use it. So, while the screen is certainly nice, it is not a motivating factor for me in getting a Retina.... but the size and weight, and performance, have tipped the scales and a 15" rMBP is what I'll be ordering in the next week or so. The 18 month interest free, no prepayment penalty financing certainly helps me get there too.
I was "this close" to just getting the current 2012 traditional MBP. The performance numbers are identical to the rMBP, and the available high res 1600x non glare matte screen is actually better than the Retina in default scale (Retina's DPI scale down to 1440x resolution by default), and its easily upgradable, not to mention that it's a hyper-ventilating $700 cheaper than the Retina.... but it's a tank in comparison. The rMBP is quite simply in a class all it's own in size to performance ratio.
But $700 is a huge delta, it will have a notable effect on my family's activity options for quite a while. I haven't bought it yet, and I'm already kicking my own *** over it
So.... I added another analysis matrix to my spreadsheet, stripping out all but the essentials. Doing so got the delta down considerably. Basically, foregoing the 512GB SSD saves me a ton on the machine, and postponing the TimeCapsule or going with a third party unit will also save considerable money.
I think it's going to work out. I'll post an update when I finally pull the trigger.
Edit: just went back and re-read this thread. Scott sure nailed it. I'm going to be adopting his recommendation.
I have spent a lot of time researching and evaluating my options, what accessories I would need to accompany a new platform (like some USB 3.0 card readers!), as well as software transition costs. I did a spreadsheet comparison between 6 different platforms:
1. Traditional 13" MBP
2. Retina 13" MBP
3. Traditional 15" MBP
4. Retina 15" MBP
5. Refurb 15" MBP (2011 model)
6. DELL 15" XPS with Windows 7
Here is a link to the spreadsheet:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w0tpf0kg6104zpp/Computer Options.xlsx
The Dell was cheapest overall because I could reuse my software, but the machine itself was only marginally more affordable than a good refurb or baseline modern MBP.
Ultimately, I've been wanting to migrate to a Mac for years, and I've decided that its now or never.
After a lot of additional consideration, I have determined that while the 13" is the most desirable form factor, the lack of a quad core processor and discrete GPU will be very noticeable in how I intend to use it. So, while the screen is certainly nice, it is not a motivating factor for me in getting a Retina.... but the size and weight, and performance, have tipped the scales and a 15" rMBP is what I'll be ordering in the next week or so. The 18 month interest free, no prepayment penalty financing certainly helps me get there too.
I was "this close" to just getting the current 2012 traditional MBP. The performance numbers are identical to the rMBP, and the available high res 1600x non glare matte screen is actually better than the Retina in default scale (Retina's DPI scale down to 1440x resolution by default), and its easily upgradable, not to mention that it's a hyper-ventilating $700 cheaper than the Retina.... but it's a tank in comparison. The rMBP is quite simply in a class all it's own in size to performance ratio.
But $700 is a huge delta, it will have a notable effect on my family's activity options for quite a while. I haven't bought it yet, and I'm already kicking my own *** over it
So.... I added another analysis matrix to my spreadsheet, stripping out all but the essentials. Doing so got the delta down considerably. Basically, foregoing the 512GB SSD saves me a ton on the machine, and postponing the TimeCapsule or going with a third party unit will also save considerable money.
I think it's going to work out. I'll post an update when I finally pull the trigger.
Edit: just went back and re-read this thread. Scott sure nailed it. I'm going to be adopting his recommendation.
Last edited: