...
I'd check the amp draw on the coil and if it's within spec then I wouldn't worry about it.
Having the electromagnet coil constantly energized will create some heat.
Thanks for the reply. I am probably making a problem where one does not exist while waiting for the rest of the parts show up. I had checked the amp draw already--
.61 amps at 12.02 on bench with power supply, .55 at 12.6 using the van battery. With the van running at 14.4 volts it will be better. The box did not give a spec, I guess I need to do a little research.
Thanks
Doug
DWH, would this be true for the Master and Ignition switched constant duty solenoids used in the power circuits for an Ambulance body also?
These pictures are just for reference, but you can see the two solenoids located in the lower left corner of the first picture, and about midway down in the second picture. The top one (R1) is the Master solenoid and is rated at 12VDC, and the other one (R30) is the Ignition switched solenoid and is rated at 15VDC. Neither solenoid has an Amp rating listed on it, but I'm trying to do some research on them now.
The Master (R1) gets too hot to touch in about 4 -5 minutes once 12VDC power is turned on to it.
View attachment 429140
View attachment 429141
This is an enlargement of the two solenoids, and the picture has been rotated 90° counterclockwise so the labels can be read.
View attachment 429142
Um. Well, in the previous example, it was heating up due to the coil being energized, but with no load through the the main contacts. The amp draw of the coil being half an amp - continuous - it makes sense that it could eventually get up to 150f. Especially if it's not bolted to a larger heat sink like a firewall.
A secondary source of heat is the current through the main contacts. Those contacts will wear over time. The heavier the amp load being switched, the faster they'll wear. Since you can't disassemble it and inspect the contacts, all you can do is check the resistance through the main contacts with the coil energized and compare that to whatever the spec is on a new one.
A quick check that I might try would be to unhook the wiring to both solenoids and then energize the coils one at a time and compare the resistance through the main contacts. Those solenoids are similar enough that the resistance should be about the same. If the R-1 is higher, then I'd be thinking worn contacts.
While I was at it, I'd probably also check the amp draw of the coil just because.
I do wonder why the coil of one solenoid is rated 12v and the other 15v...but the solenoids are obviously somewhat different so it might not be significant. Can't read the model numbers on either one, but Grainger's carries White-Rodgers.
Half an amp sounds about right.
3. I can definitely test both with a meter and compare the results. The one that's rated at 15 VDC is slighter larger that the one rated at 12VDC. It is ignition switched, so I wonder if the higher vehicle charging voltage would have anything to do with that.
I would expect any DC wiring to operate at vehicle charging voltage (12v+). Unless they've engineered some way to reduce the voltage to the R-1 coil, it should never see a voltage as low as 12v unless the batteries are getting pretty low.
Which is why it seems a bit hinky to me. We know they had solenoids available that could handle 15v, so why not use them in both positions?
And what's up with those coil ratings to begin with? I would expect solenoids like that to be rated like "12v nominal", which would be a range of like 10v-15v. White-Rodgers labeling like they did makes me think that those are specific (max) voltages, as opposed to voltage ranges.
And if the coil on R-1 is only rated to a max of 12v, but is always operating at a higher voltage, I suppose that could also cause overheating by making the electromagnet constantly pull harder than it should.
Yes, it does seem strange they would use two different solenoids when they are carrying practically the same load.
View attachment 429239
If you can get the numbers off the labels and determine the specs of the solenoids that would be important.