How would you spend 30k?

slooowr6

Explorer
calamaridog said:
My belt has 120k on it. I'll let you know when it goes;)

The recommended replacement interval is 90k and not even a Lexus dealer will charge over $900.

I've said this before and I'll say it again. The UZJ100 is an awesome used value. You really get a great vehicle for the money.

$900 that's great! I guess it's not an issue then. Is the 4.7 V8 an interference engine? If it is it's better to spend the $ now. :ylsmoke:
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
I would like to know this too, though I'm not one to postpone maintenance. I went through the owner's manual and maintenance schedule when I purchased my 4Runner (I do w/all vehicles) and wrote my own schedule.


slooowr6 said:
$900 that's great! I guess it's not an issue then. Is the 4.7 V8 an interference engine? If it is it's better to spend the $ now. :ylsmoke:
 

NAdams

Observer
Thanks to all for the great feedback....it seems the concensus is that the LC would fit the bill nicely for what we would like to do. My wife likes the idea since we would still be able to tow a pop-up camper and use the Cruiser for exploring once basecamp is established. She is still reluctant to give up the camper for a "AT" style trailer but getting the go ahead on obtaining the Cruiser is a great start. Only problem is that she is saying "If we get the LC, why do we need the Jeep?"....which makes sense. Who knows...maybe I'll get a Mazda 3 out of this deal too.

Thanks again.....

Nate
 

Bella PSD

Explorer
4Rescue said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... Nope...


Why not just buy a motor home, they're just as capable off-road. With Fords, you eithrer buy an old 7.3 TD or spend the rest of your life worrying that your 6.0 will pop a head or your tranny will go out on you. And if you go with a 7.3 you're just buying an older truck so you're kinda back in the same boat with a truck that will not last anywhere near as long as a Toyota. A toy with 200k would be less of a reliability concern than a Ford/Shivy with 50k... And no I'm not joking.

I just can not let this one go….

You may not be joking, but you are not right on some of your points. I agree, the 7.3 is getting hard to find with low miles, so the 7.3 may not be an option much longer if your looking for relatively “new” truck.

As far as reliability, you are not even close!! My F 350 is now at 90K+ and NEVER left me any were. All I have done is drive it and maintain it. Even the brakes are factory. A Toyota can NOT beat that, maybe only tie it. And it would only be a tie if the Toyota could get 20 plus MPG at the same weight as the Ford AND come with a diesel in the US. I think the key to my reliability has been the fact that a do not have an AUTO tranny and I got in on the 7.3 at the end of its production run (did not get stuck with the 6.0L). No comments about the Chevy except to say we also have an AWD GMC van with 84K and all we have done is two sets of front brakes.

I will check back when I have 200k on the Ford/7.3L and we’ll see were your Toyota is. I would bet they will be about the same except for the diesel/ gas difference.

With that said, I “almost” bought a Taco in 2002 over the F 350. Reason I did not: no manual tranny with the V6-4 door and small bed. Oh yea…and no diesel. But the TDR supercharger would have been fun!!

Louie
 
Last edited:

NAdams

Observer
C-Dog,
Thanks for the lead on the LC info...I'm sponging up as much info as I can right now so I will hopefully be more informed when the time comes to buy.
Dallas and Austin, both 3 hours away, seem to have quite a few LCs...I'm hoping to score some low miles garage queen driven by a rich soccer Mom.
Anything I should be on the lookout for good/bad in the 2002-2004 models?

Thanks,

Nate
 

4Rescue

Expedition Leader
Bella PSD said:
I just can not let this one go….

You may not be joking, but you are not right on some of your points. I agree, the 7.3 is getting hard to find with low miles, so the 7.3 may not be an option much longer if your looking for relatively “new” truck.

As far as reliability, you are not even close!! My F 350 is now at 90K+ and NEVER left me any were. All I have done is drive it and maintain it. Even the brakes are factory. A Toyota can NOT beat that, maybe only tie it. And it would only be a tie if the Toyota could get 20 plus MPG at the same weight as the Ford AND come with a diesel in the US. I think the key to my reliability has been the fact that a do not have an AUTO tranny and I got in on the 7.3 at the end of its production run (did not get stuck with the 6.0L). No comments about the Chevy except to say we also have an AWD GMC van with 84K and all we have done is two sets of front brakes.

I will check back when I have 200k on the Ford/7.3L and we’ll see were your Toyota is. I would bet they will be about the same except for the diesel/ gas difference.

With that said, I “almost” bought a Taco in 2002 over the F 350. Reason I did not: no manual tranny with the V6-4 door and small bed. Oh yea…and no diesel. But the TDR supercharger would have been fun!!

Louie

Well, that was kinda my point, At the time you bought your 7.3 it was stil probably newer than anything this guy will get to lay a finger on. And if you're implying that a Ford will out last or even out-wheel a Toyota you're dreaming. The only thing more reliable than a Toyota is another Toyota. I hear you on the Diesel issue, I've been lucky enough to live in the Holy land of Diesel Toyotas (Australia) and I can assure yuo if Toyota started building Full sized Diesel trucks, Ford and Shivvy would be completely blown out of the water.

I like the 6.0 power wise, but it's just a garbage motor from a reliability standopint and the Auto behind it isn't much better (And yes I've driven both motors and trannys). My old Boss had an 05 SD with the 6.0 and a Manual, fun to drive but I'm glad I didn't own it. And my Uncle had an Older 7.3 Auto that he couldn't wait to get rid of for His DOdge/Cummins (wich is 10 times the truck the Ford cuold ever be) The 7.3 is great for some things, but you've got to do certain very specific things to get it anywhere near the out put of the 6.0. And again, these trucks are getting harder and harder to find. Flat out, if you want an American Diesel, the Cummins/Dodge combo is the best by leaps and bounds. I'd wager to say that any Cummins motor is about the closest thing you can get to Toyota like reliability. In fact they might make the only motor on the planet that can rival the 22RE or 2F for durability, they're just the best Diesel made IMO (in America).

Cheers and No Worries

Dave
 

4Rescue

Expedition Leader
Oh and as for Milage... I have 246K on my 22RE and All I've replaced is the brakes and the CLutch and a timing chain...I highly doubt your Ford will last as long as my Gen1 runner. The PO did 0 maintanence to the poor little bugger and it's still running strong. I haul 3 guys and a weeks worth of Rafting gear from Portland out to Idaho and back (450miles one way) alot and while it may suck going over mountain passes with the little 4 banger, it does it and get's me home every time. Pound for pound it's a heavier duty truck than any american 3/4 ton...
 

Bella PSD

Explorer
I think we are getting down to just a difference of opinion here. Not facts. I am surprised that I would have to defend the 7.3 reliability. It’s common knowledge that the 7.3 are about built proof. After reading your post yesterday, I was on the phone with a client of mine that has Fords. I asked how many miles he was up to….7.3 International with 370,000 and a 6.9 International with 680,000 miles. His 7.3 never had a problem, the 6.9 was sold and the new owner rebuilt it at 660,000 miles just because he thought it was time (not a dead motor). It’s also a proven fact that the T 444E and the Cummuns have the same reliability. Both Cummins and International have studies out proving they are equal. Funny that you mention the Cummins equal to the 22r for reliabity. With the 2 studies mentioned above, that would also make the 7.3 even with the 22r for reliability. I just have a hard time comparing reliability and longevity between a gas and diesel, it’s like minor league to major league.

You also mention power output and infer that the T 444E International is harder to get big power. True, if you are talking about 500-1000 hp. But for 99% of us that are not concerned with that kind of really big “bragging rights” power, a Ford and Dodge can be tuned equal in power for about the same price as long as the power increase is around 320-400 rwhp. That’s the most any Ford or Dodge owner will ever see. The rest are that 1% that are going for big HP numbers and may not be reliable, just show trucks, pulling trucks, or not even daily drivers. And what good is 500-1000 hp when it comes to an expo, off road truck? None!

So getting easy big power from a Cummins is no concern to me at all, just good old boy bragging rights. I think Cummins has that “its just like a big rig” going for it, when it comes to its rep. But that means nothing when it comes to reliability or longevity. All image or perception.

You also say that the 7.3 are getting hard to find used. True, because they are in demand. The word is spreading that the 7.3 may be about the best set up going right now, new or used, for the purpose it was built for. I have even meet one person that sold his 1 year old truck and go back to a 7.3L.

I would like to take your statement above “The only thing more reliable than a Toyota is another Toyota” and put that statement to work. You go on to say “they (Cummins) might make the only motor on the planet that can rival the 22RE or 2F for durability”. With that logic, it would add up like this….22r is equal to a Cummins and its been proven that the Cummins is equal to the International T 444E for reliability and longevity.

As far as this” if you're implying that a Ford will out last or even out-wheel a Toyota you're dreaming.” Not sure what your saying here. The Ford ‘s are leaf sprung (99-04), Dana 60 solid axle (no IFS!), Diesel, come with a 6 speed manual tranny, and good old floor shift 4WD with lock out hubs. (No push button anything) That sounds good to me.
There just big, that’s about the only “wheeling” disadvantage. They are definitely set up right!

Sounds like Nate is set on a LC anyway. I don’t want to hijack his thread now that he is look for a LC.

Louie

4Rescue said:
Well, that was kinda my point, At the time you bought your 7.3 it was stil probably newer than anything this guy will get to lay a finger on. And if you're implying that a Ford will out last or even out-wheel a Toyota you're dreaming. The only thing more reliable than a Toyota is another Toyota. I hear you on the Diesel issue, I've been lucky enough to live in the Holy land of Diesel Toyotas (Australia) and I can assure yuo if Toyota started building Full sized Diesel trucks, Ford and Shivvy would be completely blown out of the water.

I like the 6.0 power wise, but it's just a garbage motor from a reliability standopint and the Auto behind it isn't much better (And yes I've driven both motors and trannys). My old Boss had an 05 SD with the 6.0 and a Manual, fun to drive but I'm glad I didn't own it. And my Uncle had an Older 7.3 Auto that he couldn't wait to get rid of for His DOdge/Cummins (wich is 10 times the truck the Ford cuold ever be) The 7.3 is great for some things, but you've got to do certain very specific things to get it anywhere near the out put of the 6.0. And again, these trucks are getting harder and harder to find. Flat out, if you want an American Diesel, the Cummins/Dodge combo is the best by leaps and bounds. I'd wager to say that any Cummins motor is about the closest thing you can get to Toyota like reliability. In fact they might make the only motor on the planet that can rival the 22RE or 2F for durability, they're just the best Diesel made IMO (in America).

Cheers and No Worries

Dave
 
Last edited:

4Rescue

Expedition Leader
I agree, the 7.3 is bulletproof, but the rest of the truck isn't put together as solid... The interior will be rattley and bits will fall off, ask me how I know ;)

Plus, as I'm starting to see, you have kind of a rare/desirable combo truck ya know... The good looking body with the better (older/phased out) motor, but there don't seem to be alot of them floating around eh... And I agree they're hard to find cause the people who have them aren't selling them (kind of like 1st gen 4Runners eh...)And on a Wheeling note, yeah they have beefy drivetrains, but they're land barges, that's all I was realy implying. Good luck getting a 2/350 down the same trails I can fit my Toy down (I'm guessing there's a slight difference between the terrain in Ohio and the terrain here in Oregon to be fair).

And while the 7.3 is quite good, the known service life/duty cycle is not as long as the Cummins as I stated. The Cummins is a sleved block and widely known to be the most durable Diesel in American domestic pickups that's not immage, that's observed service records. Ford had what 13 TSB's on the last gen super duty's compared to the 3 that Dodge issued (Shivy led the way with 19 and that Killer Dowel Pin issue is therewith the Cummins). And to be fair, I'm not refering to comercial tractor trailer motors, I'm talking about trucks the general public buy's and drives.

So like I said, I think you've got what I would consider to be the current best of Ford trucks, but still it's American, and the build quality/longevity of the chasis is nowhere near that of the Japanese trucks.

If, in 10+ years were still seeing as many Ford/Shivy/Dodge trucks as you do Old Toyota 4x4's I'll eat my words, but somehow I don't think it'll happen. Maybe it's just the NW, but everywhere you look there is an old PU or 4Runner chugging away with 200+k on the clock.
 
Last edited:

greenhorn

Adventurer
Probably not my place to bring it up being a noob, but some one struck a nerve. In the spirit of the rules:

" 2. People buy different vehicles because they meet their needs and appearances. There is NO BEST VEHICLE for everything, and to say so is silly. Comments in fun about another persons vehicle choice is fine, but to flame a member because they chose a vehicle you wouldn't buy is poor form. "

I've owned a 7.3 T44E, put well over 100K miles on it and it never rattled, squeaked, was never once in the shop for anything. One of the best trucks I've ever owned.

I've owned several Toyotas over the years, all excellent trouble free rides.

There are alot of nice rides on this site. Every one has their idea on what a perfect ride is. Every ride has its strengths and weaknesses. Yes the Ford is a big rig, yes the Toyota doesn't have the same payload.

Let me buy the first round of frosty beverages and lets help a brother spend $30K with a ride that fits his needs the best
:beer:
 

NAdams

Observer
Greenhorn,
Thanks for the frosty cold Fat Tire....No worries on the great truck debate. You see, I'm living ********** in the middle of truck country here in west Texas and a big full-size truck is the last thing I want.....I'm doing my best to NOT fit in. So I don't mind if the guys bandy about the pro/cons of Ford vs. toyota, we know what appeals to us and appreciate all the help from this great forum.

Although, I have to admit I saw an FJ Cruiser tonight and gave it a quick walk around. So many Toyotas....so little time!!

Thanks,

Nate
 

kcowyo

ExPo Original
greenhorn said:
Probably not my place to bring it up being a noob, but some one struck a nerve. In the spirit of the rules:

" 2. People buy different vehicles because they meet their needs and appearances. There is NO BEST VEHICLE for everything, and to say so is silly. Comments in fun about another persons vehicle choice is fine, but to flame a member because they chose a vehicle you wouldn't buy is poor form. "

You've got it exactly right, greenhorn. A good reminder for those members who have been here for awhile.
 

Bella PSD

Explorer
NAdams said:
Greenhorn,
Thanks for the frosty cold Fat Tire....No worries on the great truck debate. You see, I'm living ********** in the middle of truck country here in west Texas and a big full-size truck is the last thing I want.....I'm doing my best to NOT fit in. So I don't mind if the guys bandy about the pro/cons of Ford vs. toyota, we know what appeals to us and appreciate all the help from this great forum.

Although, I have to admit I saw an FJ Cruiser tonight and gave it a quick walk around. So many Toyotas....so little time!!

Thanks,

Nate

Nate,

I will try to keep this on track, again. The FJ, at first to me, looked VERY promising. But the fuel economy was not very good, actually seems pretty bad. Maybe fuel economy seems worse to me because I wanted the FJ Cruiser to come out with a diesel. I did read in Four Wheeler November issue that the FJ Cruiser will come out with a removable top!!

The American SUV shopping mall crowed seems to drive option on this truck. Most dealers seem to get them fully loaded with all the crap I do not want. And I tried to order a stripped down model without an auto tranny, steel wheel, back when they came out and just got the run around. Good thing because the fuel economy and the auto tranny would have left me unhappy. I also think there was not much room for a family of 4 on long road trips. I think your still MUCH better off looking for the little old lady, never off road LC.

And to clear up some misinformation. And this is a big one, along with some others but I will just correct the one online.

The C 5.9L is a parent bore engine and does not use sleeves. Heck, the new C 6.7L is a parent bore engine too, NO sleeves. Its this kind of misinformation that floats around the net that is just bad and sometimes dangerous!!

Louie
 
Last edited:

4Rescue

Expedition Leader
Ya know, that's true, I've jut learned that the Ram motors and the P-stroke a Parent bore... I thought that ALL Cummins motors were Wet-sleve's, but apparently not. Learn something new everyday. :oops:

So again, get a UZJ100 and be done with it, that's where this all started. Oh and post pics when you get it :chowtime:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,923
Messages
2,922,230
Members
233,083
Latest member
Off Road Vagabond
Top