It was all good until I read "I even carry gloves and dressings in my jacket." That's a little excessive for anything less than an EMT, IMHO.
I disagree. They're called UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS for a reason.
Back in 1983 (way before I went to medical school) I was just an EMT/SAR guy. Returning home from a training exercise I was first on scene of a pretty bad traffic accident, and as part of my attempts to render aid I crawled through blood covered broken glass and got cut up.
A few months later, I had Hepatitis-C (back then we called it Non-A/Non-B). I may need a liver transplant (if I can get one) at some point in the future. Universal precautions, and the mind-set they created, were barely being taught then, if at ll. I think everyone who thinks they may administer first aid should start out with a box of gloves, a CPR shield and maybe eye protection.
Obtaining First Aid knowledge is great, and I highly recommend it for everyone... but there are restrictions, guidelines, and liabilities that some may not be aware of.
Ever heard of DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) cards? You're liable to find yourself in court, sued, over violating a person's wishes, if they carry the card.
Not really. This came up as a question from one of my medics (I'm an EMS Medical Director). To be sued, you'd have to be knowledgeable that they had a DNR, that a reasonable person in your position with your training would have acted differently, and that you did something wrong.
Since people don't usually carry DNR orders around, and a medic-alert bracelet is not adequate notification (DNR's specify the nature of a persons illness and the degree of care they want or don't want, you can't fit it on a line - or as one person I saw, a tattoo on the chest) field personnel, unless TOLD by competent medical personnel, are pretty much immune. Even if they did have the orders with them, odds are they hadn't specified whatever accident they were in.
Also remember that if you carry a Licence for First Aid, CPR, Lifeguarding, ETC, and have recieved proper training, you are heald liable for your actions, no matter how well and good your intentions are. Even by using your best judgement, if you make a "wrong" call, you're responsible... Also be very mindful of card expiration dates. You could be one day expired, have to use your skills and abilities, and then be held responsible for practicing first aid illegally, while otherwise someone without proper training, could be covered over the good sumaritain clause... Meaning, in the event of this ever happening, you may be better off Instructing someone with no licence to save, rather than doing so yourself with an expired license.
Just some food for thought.
Well, we were going to fly up to
Ryan airstrip today but the weather is craptacular so this is kind of long...
Not even close. You don't have licenses for CPR, lifeguard, whatever. I have a license from several states to practice medicine. Some states license prehospital personnel (some don't) but specify fairly strictly what the limits of that license is (scope of practice). In most cases for advanced EMT's they can do what I say they can do but its on MY MEDICAL license....and for anyone but an EMT-basic, they must be on duty in most cases, or they only have -basic scopes of practice.
Volunteer first aiders/lifeguards have is a 'certificate' that certifies on a particular date you met a standard of performance after completing a standard course of instruction. Do it wrong? Oh, well. As long as 'doing it wrong' doesn't involve practicing medicine, there's not much you can get into trouble for. If I do it wrong, aside from civil liability (my malpractice insurance) I can lose my license to practice, and conceivably be sentenced to jail for manslaughter or murder.
Here's what one of my CPR cards says:
Successful Completion Card
National Cognitive Skills Evaluations in accordance with
the guidelines of the American Heart Association®
Research and curriculum of the ProCPR, LLC Healthcare
Provider Program. Adult/Infant/Child CPR & AED.
Not even a certificate.
As far as the various Good Samaritan laws go, each state is different and some don't have any at all. But it's safe to say that as long as you perform at your level of training (and not in excess of it) and do what a reasonable person with the same level of training would have done, you're OK. And I've been admitted as an expert witness in a few states in suits against medics.
There is more of a risk, IMHO, that if you identify yourself as a whatever, and don't perform then you're liable. A tort (a civil lawsuit seeking monetary recompense for a harm that was done to you) requires 4 elements be proven: Each element has to be present for the suit to go against you.
- There has to be a Duty to Act...There is an expectation that you will perform....Put a bunch of EMS stickers on your car and it's at least possible that a lawsuit can go against you, although I don't think it's ever been done yet;
- Having a duty to act (expectation of care) you have not provided that attempt (you can fail, but you have to try) If you fail, thats another issue (malpractice). This is called a Breech of Duty
- That breach of duty was the cause, or close to being the cause in the law, of someone being harmed, (Proximate or near proximate cause);
- Someone actually was harmed because of your breech.
Most people think that it's #3 that causes the trouble, really it isn't for volunteers. Now, if you're getting paid to be a lifeguard or whatever, thats different: You're not a volunteer, and thats why there are usually higher standards of training and certification for 'professionals' than volunteers. For example, the fact that I got a Boy Scouts Lifesaving Merit badge 40 years ago is nice, but its not quite the same as being a LA County Lifeguard...and I wouldn't be held to the same standards. And even if it was, hey - I did the best I could with the training and resources I had.
Now, issue #1 is why medical abandonment is such an issue. You create an expectation that you're going to handle something, and a more qualified individual passes by, or someone doesn't call for more help. For example, say you see a kid in a stream having trouble. You jump up and say "I'll take care of it" and the pros don't get called? Better get him, quickly, without hurting him. You have created an EXPECTATION that you will help and are competent to do so...thats #1 and #2. That same action applies to a professional dumping a patient. Not a good thing to do.
Anyway, most volunteers, unpaid (and upaid means you receive NOTHING, not even a free cup of coffee, I'm told there have been attempts to claim that a free meal created a situation where people tried to get Good Sam laws tossed), are OK. And realistically, if you don't have much to lose, you don't have much chance of someone taking it away from you. If you have a lot to lose, malpractice insurance (even for medics) might be a good idea.