I've gotten a chance to play with both APRS and Winlink. I tried each on VHF and also on HF. I used the direwolf software TNC and winmor with my IC-7100s from a Win10 virtual machine running on my Mac laptop. These modes are not as good as robust-packet or pactor, but I didn't want to shell out money for dedicated hardware for this test. I tried each on my home station and in my Jeep using only the attached screwdriver antenna.
kb1ejh, I see what you mean by Winlink being a better "I've arrived in camp" solution.
I was able to get VHF APRS working from both the home antenna and in my Jeep. APRS does not seem to have a way to send a confirmation that the email was delivered. Also, when you send an email from APRS, there does not seem to be a good way for a non-ham to respond to that message. I can get a confirmation of location packets being received, by getting my own location back from the digipeter on VHF.
I was able to get Winlink working both at home and in the Jeep on VHF. I was able to send both position reports and emails though the node on Crystal Peak over San Jose. I was also able to get read receipts from the emails and receive responses from my non-ham family members. Winlink specifically states that 3rd party (non-ham) traffic on the Winlink system is allowed in the US, so responses are OK.
I was not able to send any APRS messages or position reports on HF. It looks like there is only one HF standard frequency for APRS and that band wasn't really open this weekend. I tried from both my home dipole and from the Jeep, neither were successful. If I didn't have internet access, there wouldn't be any way for me to know that it wasn't successful. I also left the laptop running overnight on the home antenna on the HF APRS frequency with the TNC enabled and it didn't receive a single packet all night.
I was not able to connect with HF Winlink from my Jeep. The RTTY contest this weekend filled the digital parts of 17m, 20m, and 40m. The Winlink upload frequencies were all full of RTTY signals. I don't have an antenna that will tune to 80m or below so I didn't try there. I wonder if people on boats are having trouble sending emails this weekend due to the contest activity...
I found one uplink frequency that appeared to be clear to a node in Baja, MX. I was able to send a HF email with Winlink from my home antenna to it, however the antenna on the Jeep appears to be insufficient to send that far away. I will try again after midnight tonight here on the west coast, after all but the most dedicated contesters have gone to bed.
All in all, I think it was a good test. It's pretty much a worst-case-scenereo for the HF spectrum right now. It's near the solar minimum, and the bands are full of other signals making it that much harder to get through.
So far, I believe that Winlink will probably work for me on HF if I get out the big inverted Vee that I carry along with to camp. The camp antenna is actually a better antenna then the one I have at home, since I can put out a full length OCF dipole at camp, and I need to use a coil-shortened center-fed one at home since my property is not long enough for a 80 foot long antenna. I have the same TX power available at camp and at home, the antennas are at about the same height, and at camp there would be less interference and buildings near the antenna. The only issue with the big inverted-Vee is that setting it up in a situation where I need to call-for-help due to an injury may be problematic. It takes me about an hour to get that antenna put together.
I am still hopeful that Winlink HF might work from my vehicle, but I'm not sure I want to commit to planing my remote trips around avoiding digital-mode contest weekends. I need to play with this a little more.