JT w/ AluCab Khaya Camper

mav204

Observer
I am looking at getting a JT and long term running the Khaya Camper, I'd like to be able to use the pickup for stuff around the house and then put the Khaya in for Camping. MSO had this in their Tacoma, but anyone have this in their JT and how do you like it or don't like.
 

brookie0907

Member
The Khaya Camper was my ideal plan, but bed capacity of the JT is an issue. The camper weighs a least 750 lbs and my Rubicon has a limit of 1200 lbs. Watching.
 

Herbie

Rendezvous Conspirator
Will it even fit? I thought the Gladiator bed was smaller in a couple of key dimensions?
 

smbisig

Adventurer
Before I ordered my Alu-Cab Canopy Camper, I was looking at the Khaya. Because I was told it wouldn't fit and all the warnings from Jeep that the Gladiator is not approved for slide-ins, just just ordered the Canopy Camper.
 

mav204

Observer
if your over GVWR, but your upgrade your suspension, can you get a greater GVWR but not official from the OEM?
 

Herbie

Rendezvous Conspirator
GVWR is a whole other issue, and the short answer is: It takes more than suspension.

That said, as I asked in post #4: WILL IT EVEN FIT?

The basic mechanical dimensions of the camper are on the Alu-Cab site here: https://www.alu-cab.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Khaya-GA.pdf

I would start by comparing those dimensions to those of the JT bed. I don't have one to measure, but based on what I can find in a 5-minute google search, you're going to have more than a foot of stick-out past the end of the bed just at the floor level, and portions of the camper sticking out like 2+ feet from the end of the bed. Aside from looking bad, it will likely shift the COG too far aft to be a good idea.

You'll also want to look at how the bump-out past the wheel well lines up (the 1200mm vs 622mm measurements in the bottom-center orientation - it's possible that you'd have to mount the camper even farther aft if the wheel wells don't line up with that.)
 

fourfa

Observer
You deserve a long answer too. In the US, AFAIK there is no way to re-rate the official GVWR, full stop. (I gather in some Australian states you can, but this seems to come with strict enforcement, checkpoints, mandatory weight checks, etc that are unheard of in USA.)

Upgrading suspension to stay off the bump stops and handle OK with overload is the easiest part, and in most cases it seems that's all anyone deals with. Brakes can be upgraded to bigger pads, calipers, & rotors (though for Tacomas specifically, improving the wimpy rear drums usually also means a whole rear axle swap, master cylinder swap, etc and is rare. Overweight Tacomas usually just have awful brakes. Mine did).

The official GVWR also encompasses cooling, emissions, towing, handling and rollover tests, crash tests, et cetera. Even if you modified the truck to compensate for every single one of those things, you could still be on the hook legally in the event of a crash and a lawsuit or prosecution... What's the likelihood of that in the real world; well that's probably a different thread.

Personally I aim to minimize or eliminate overload. On the gladiator platform, that's going to mean strict attention to weight in every way possible. With a Khaya there would be little to nothing left over; certainly it would not be possible to deck it out to make full use of the space and possibilities. For me it's out of the question even if it were to fit.

Even a smaller ACCC will need careful management of loadout, accessories, and extras to stay under GVWR (in fact that's exactly what I'm doing with the JT and ACCC I have coming to replace my old Taco)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,178
Messages
2,903,430
Members
229,665
Latest member
SANelson
Top