I love the looks of a Land Rover, and almost pulled the trigger on a discovery a couple of years ago. The maintenance costs and things that go bad in them are what deterred me from buying a land rover. And the fact that I didn't really need one. I am not bashing rovers because someday I hope to own one, but the type of repairs and failures that these vehicles have at 100k are appalling IMO. A vehicle that costs as much as a Land Rover should not have things like water pumps, all kinds of sensors, suspension parts, bearings etc failing at or under 100k. Not with the technology that we have. I know that there are a lot of other vehicles that have issues as well, it just always seems to me that LR has a ton of them and then some. I think LR has been selling vehicles on their reputation, and people have taken up for them over the years because they are cool vehicles. Until consumers hold LR feet to the fire and they build $50-100,000 vehicles that last, then they will continue to not take their quality control seriously. That has been the biggest detractor for me in seriously looking at a Land Rover new or otherwise. And I really want to like them. I just don't want to sit around looking at them and wearing their repairs as a badge of honor so to speak. I have owned Toyotas, Fords, quite a few Jeeps, Chevy's and now a Ram so I really don't have a lot of brand loyalty. I would love to be able to be able to be loyal to LR but until they get their act together I will just admire them from afar. I will say that a plus on the current Ram I own was that the tranny was built by ZF the same company that builds the tranny for Land Rover, and one thing I have never heard too much about is transmission failures on these vehicles not caused by other parts.
I think the original poster was spot on as far as factoring in repairs to used vehicles, any used vehicle..I always factor in at least a couple of thousand into what I am paying for getting things up to snuff.
'