plainjaneFJC
Deplorable
Is it really called caviar.?
It is....always find stuff like that funny, it's prestigious I guess....kinda like "champagne, ruby or emerald" instead of white, red or green....Is it really called caviar.?
haha, love that movie!I just equate caviar with a young Tom Hanks spitting it back out on his cracker..😆
Well they drive dragging the brake or suck at math- those numbers are major outliers.The overtrail Lexus was my next vehicle purchase until my neighbor bought one, does not drive for fuel mileage, his averages around 13, says range is about 250. His neighbor bought a new Sequoia with the same motor and fuel economy is under 10.
Hard to believe - it's a 3.X L twin turbo, and based on everything I've read it's gets sim mileage to other 3.X L Turbo engines like the EcoBoost, which is mid teens. The Tundra gets mid/high teens, I'd expect the Sequoia and GX would be in same ballpark:The overtrail Lexus was my next vehicle purchase until my neighbor bought one, does not drive for fuel mileage, his averages around 13, says range is about 250. His neighbor bought a new Sequoia with the same motor and fuel economy is under 10.
Hard to believe - it's a 3.X L twin turbo, and based on everything I've read it's gets sim mileage to other 3.X L Turbo engines like the EcoBoost, which is mid teens. The Tundra gets mid/high teens, I'd expect the Sequoia and GX would be in same ballpark:
MAJOR outliers - but the EcoBoosts have major outliers too, I honestly think some people just drive Turbo engines in boost often, but 10 MPG is laughable, my 3/4 T Ram w/6.4 Hemi gets better than that loaded for a weekend of camping/moto in the mountains.Well they drive dragging the brake or suck at math- those numbers are major outliers.
True - but @yfarm was basing his comment/purchase decision on abnormal driving conditions and nothing close to average, that was the point. If a small(ish) light SUV with 1/2 the displacement of my 3/4T Ram and 1/2 the weight is getting the same MPG or less....something is wrong.Driving style will cause fuel mileage to vary a lot. My 2007 Tundra 5.7L would get single-digit MPG if I treated a stoplight like a drag strip Christmas tree.
Normal running around town with mixed urban driving would get me 17 MPG.
Heavy acceleration and heavy braking is common in most pickups and SUVs around where I live so MPG figures are generally bad and brake jobs are frequent.
Pretty sure the Sequoia has a different engine from the Lexus, the Sequoia adds the hybrid system. All things being equal, I can't imagine the addition of the hybrid system would produce worse fuel economy. The Sequoia is larger, but generally only 100-150 pounds heavier. Not surprised by the Lexus number though, that is close to what I have heard as well.The overtrail Lexus was my next vehicle purchase until my neighbor bought one, does not drive for fuel mileage, his averages around 13, says range is about 250. His neighbor bought a new Sequoia with the same motor and fuel economy is under 10.
I don't think the issue is the cost of gas, it's more that these things have like a 21 gallon tank, so range could be an issue for some. Not me, but I can see that making people grumpy.Can't imagine fuel consumption would be a deal breaker here. These are 80 - 100K vehicles here so...