Victory_Overland
Explorer
Okay, this might blow up good or bad, but I'm going to ask anyway because the "Search" did not find my answer.
Toyota guys are running a lot of sway bar disconnects with good results. Some great, some average, and some show no difference, but either way, the topic is worth discussion with an adjustable suspension (EAS) or lift springs, spacers.
Almost every suspension lift I have experienced in my lifetime recommended longer sway bar links due to increased stretch on links, bushings, in a lifted configuration with stock length links. I am assuming that LR figured this into the EAS system as a plus or minus in performance. I understand the sway bar for the road, so I am going to ask we not get into this theory as it makes sense to me completely.
However, is there a potential increase in articulation and suspension stresses reduced with front links removed/disconnected on IFS LRs while off-road? Again, the Tacoma guys are running them and notice good results in the front wheels during off-road conditions. The theory is it completely isolates each wheel from each other with no sway bar force from one side to the other. This, of course, will not matter if one wheel is off the ground at max travel. However, it does matter when both are on the ground, and one is completely compressed as it does transfer to the other side via the sway bar.
I've also see disconnects on some special operations IFS vehicles, so there is a concept there that someone thinks is valid. Limit straps can be an option for the maximum droop angles if completely unloaded.
I could be wrong on this, so I am opening up for dialogue.
Anyone running coils or bigger lift on an LR3/4 that cares to chime in I would like to hear your thoughts.
Toyota guys are running a lot of sway bar disconnects with good results. Some great, some average, and some show no difference, but either way, the topic is worth discussion with an adjustable suspension (EAS) or lift springs, spacers.
Almost every suspension lift I have experienced in my lifetime recommended longer sway bar links due to increased stretch on links, bushings, in a lifted configuration with stock length links. I am assuming that LR figured this into the EAS system as a plus or minus in performance. I understand the sway bar for the road, so I am going to ask we not get into this theory as it makes sense to me completely.
However, is there a potential increase in articulation and suspension stresses reduced with front links removed/disconnected on IFS LRs while off-road? Again, the Tacoma guys are running them and notice good results in the front wheels during off-road conditions. The theory is it completely isolates each wheel from each other with no sway bar force from one side to the other. This, of course, will not matter if one wheel is off the ground at max travel. However, it does matter when both are on the ground, and one is completely compressed as it does transfer to the other side via the sway bar.
I've also see disconnects on some special operations IFS vehicles, so there is a concept there that someone thinks is valid. Limit straps can be an option for the maximum droop angles if completely unloaded.
I could be wrong on this, so I am opening up for dialogue.
Anyone running coils or bigger lift on an LR3/4 that cares to chime in I would like to hear your thoughts.