The problem with winching these beasts is what do you attach the winch to? Once you get really stuck the options become local farm tractors or heavy equipment, bulldozer, high hoe , etc.
There is a reason why elephants travel in herdsThe problem with winching these beasts is what do you attach the winch to?
Yes. 2 x 14000 lb Pullpals. 2 each 1/2” 20’ steel cables with loops at each end, big shackles; at 30 deg angle.Has anyone ever used a land anchor (or 3)?
I'm still getting some info; Front axle ratio 38.8 / rear 47.9
Front axle listing says: A50 FRONT AXLE WITH INCREASED CARRYING LOAD
Based on what I've picked up on other threads, these are medium fast axles?? Good, bad, indifferent?
Ya can't have 2 different axle ratios!I have 39: 8, its a medium/fast axle ratio i get about 90-95km/h cruising just over 2000rpm (in the green zone) with my larger 385/65R22.5 tires.
There is a detailed thread about the ratios and lots of info about what type of axle ratios are available somewhere on this forum. I priced upgrading to the faster axles at about 4000 euros for parts and another 2000 for labour (43:10 ratio based on Mercedes crownwheel & pinion for the front axle and the existing aftermarket rear crownwheel & pinion). I never went down that road in the end..
Ya can't have 2 different axle ratios!
That’s true if one axle has reduction hubs (planetary or portal), but not the other. HOWEVER, hub ratios are on the order of 1.5-3.0:1, NOT a mere paltry 1.1-1.3:1, which the ratio of ratios presented here. And, if an axle has hub reduction, the ratio is USUALLY (apologize for capitals) presented as the total product of diff times hubs. And, it usually doesn’t come out as the ratio of 2 lowish numbers (like 43:10). For example, mine is 2.182 (24:11) x 2.714 (38:14 ) = 5.922. Which is precisely 456:77; not reducible beyond that, no common factors.You can if the front axle is a normal axle with a large central diff, and the rear axle has hub reduction hubs... Prop shaft speed going into both axles will be the same, but the axle shafts in the rear axle will be turning a lot faster (lower ratio in the rear axle differential), as the final reduction is done in the hubs in the center of the wheels. With hub reduction axles (though heavier) the diff and shafts can be smaller as they are spinning faster with less torque, but then the speed is reduced in the hub (which in turn increases the torque at the wheel). The gain is axles with better clearance and capable of handelling more hp than a conventional axle. The loss is that a hub reduction axle is a lot heavier, so the payload of the vehicle can then be lessened as the vehicle weight is heavier!
That’s true if one axle has reduction hubs (planetary or portal), but not the other. HOWEVER, hub ratios are on the order of 1.5-3.0:1, NOT a mere paltry 1.1-1.3:1, which the ratio of ratios presented here. And, if an axle has hub reduction, the ratio is USUALLY (apologize for capitals) presented as the total product of diff times hubs. And, it usually doesn’t come out as the ratio of 2 lowish numbers (like 43:10). For example, mine is 2.182 (24:11) x 2.714 (38:14 ) = 5.922. Which is precisely 456:77; not reducible beyond that, no common factors.
Specifically, neither 39:8 or 43:10 have common factors; I can’t imagine a 13:4 ring & pinion. And 43 is a prime number!! So no geared huns on either, and a ratio/ratio of 1.1337 too far from 1.00 to be compatible with each other UNLESS front singles 14-15% taller than rear (duals). Which may indeed be the case.
Ya can't have 2 different axle ratios!
Ha! That's hilarious! I actually was going to go 6x6 at first, maybe 35ft+ long. But the more I researched the more I started thinking I should go smaller.
The Mercedes 1224 I'm looking at is me 'downsizing'