I don't think people are coming after you per say. I think they just can't figure out why a guy who states he has no interest in something is posting vigorously to defend it.
That's why I made my first post quoting you. I just don't get why your seemingly so passionate when it comes to their reputation.
I'll bet your a good friend to those you care about.
Thanks. I do defend my friends. I also defend strangers, but I see a distinct difference between asking for fairness and mounting a defence of VORSHEER. Maybe that's not so clear to others.
I have repeatedly directed people to VORSHEER's thread. I've repeatedly asked that hard questions be put to them there, since that's where V has been answering them. I'm not familiar enough with the M meltdown to ask the right questions, and I have no standing in the matter.
I've repeatedly asked for proof that V is not acting in good faith, and the best response has been that since they bought Moby1's assets and members V's staff were employed by M (is that even true?), V is a scam. That's simply a faulty argument. If proof exists it should be well publicized.
I've repeatedly said that the M victims should put the work in to prove what links exist between M & V, and I've repeatedly said that if V is shown to be a scam, they should be exposed. I suggested that a financial link between M & V might prove to be a way for M victims to receive compensation.
VORSHEER definitely should defend itself from some of these attacks - which is what I keep saying, and why I keep telling people to post their comments in the right place. Since I haven't thrown in with the attackers, I've been characterized as some kind of flack for V. If someone really believes that's true, they're seeing what they want to see, and I can't talk them out of it. I just don't get it.