That's part of my point. It's not a communications plan, it's just a random list of radio frequencies. Who is supposed to talk to whom and for what purpose? There *are* a handful of frequencies that could be handy to know, under some circumstances. There's one VHF air frequency used for emergencies, that I don't think is listed among the one hundred. There's one VHF marine calling/emergency frequency. There's one generally accepted 2m FM calling frequency, and one 440. Having a list of local 2m repeaters and their tones could be handy, too.
If you're really in trouble, not just out of coffee or unable to find your hotel, and the rest of the world is all fine, then it would be good to be able to reach out to someone. It's been my experience that people will help out a stranger in need, when they and their family are secure. I'm new to this forum, but that seems like it fits in, as a way to help out or be helped, when off in the woods or mountains or wherever.
Also along those lines, if all is good and you want to make new friends on the air, then the ham repeaters, and 2m/440 simplex, and a channel for FRS/GMRS, MURS, CB would be great, too. Have some fun with the radio, meet some new people, all good stuff. I've met great people over the air.
But if there is a local or regional disaster, just who are you going to talk with? That seems like a lousy time to reach out and meet new people. Would you share information? Perhaps. Share supplies? Hmmm... That could work out. But who has more, who has the greater need, and who sets the rules of exchange? This sounds like a bad plan, and kinda sounds off-topic to this forum, too...although I really don't know, I am new and want to remain respectful of the forum.
I'll stand by my support of the tin-foil comment. Having a plan "B" is always a good idea, but when your backup plan is a primary focus, then your priorities, in my not always humble opinion, are backwards pretty much by definition. Not suggesting that anyone here does that, but to identify yourself as a "prepper" to me says that you're identifying more for having a good plan "B" than a good plan "A". Myself, I'd rather have a good plan, and do a quick risk analysis on the rest.