words
So if I’m reading LR’s info correctly that’s 330lbs before you have to start subtracting from your payload. So if you want to have a 770lb tongue weight you have to subtract 440lbs from your payload.
^ Correct.
You didn't read the spec. Can you please read the spec? Your common sense is failing miserably here, and you've again incorrectly quoted the LR tongue weight as 330lb, which it's not.
Not a subscriber to SAE, not going to pay $80 and the 330 lb rating is from LRs own web site for both the new Defender and Range Rover.
Yeah they usually don’t tow faster 50mph.^ Correct. I tried to explain this to mpinco but he got lost in common sense.
Plenty of great information to read if you're interested. Layman explanation is that in EU since trailering speeds are far lower and thus the stability issues are also a less of a concern. Physics of course are the same on both continents.
So you're going to ignore the test method, ignore the footnote next to the stated tongue weight, and go back to claiming 'common sense.'
Hey guys, the earth is flat. I know that bc I have common sense. Get outta here with your science and crap.
View attachment 601387
^ Correct. I tried to explain this to mpinco but he got lost in common sense.
Plenty of great information to read if you're interested. Layman explanation is that in EU since trailering speeds are far lower and thus the stability issues are also a less of a concern. Physics of course are the same on both continents.
So you're going to ignore the test method, ignore the footnote next to the stated tongue weight, and go back to claiming 'common sense.'
Hey guys, the earth is flat. I know that bc I have common sense. Get outta here with your science and crap.
Not ignoring anything. The advertised tongue weight has dropped to 330 lbs as the SAE spec came into play. LR is less than a 1/2 ton pickup when compared to Ford. Good to know.
Not ignoring anything, just pretending to play engineer while you ignore the published specifications, test method, and measurement criteria.
You also ignored the part where the rover isn't a pickup truck at all... soo..... yeah. Can't help ya there. Or in general I guess.
From a legal standpoint it might not be a bad idea to advertise the full payload rating.Been down this path before on towing with others. It is why some in that conversation moved to LC200's and F250's. Bottom line is that per the spec LR D7 architecture is less than a 1/2 ton pickup. I'm fine with that. Everything is a compromise at some point. Example - air suspension prevents use of Weight Distribution Hitches. I'm OK with that. I do think potential LR customers will see the 330lb rating and go - ******! and walk away without a further investigation. I would not have marketed a vehicles tow rating assuming full payload. Take a survey of travel trailer tongue weights and you're going to find nearly EVERY ONE of them has a tongue weight greater than 330 lbs. At a cursory level that eliminates Land Rover completely as a candidate for a Tow Vehicle.
Will be interesting to see the Ineos Grenadier spec.
Have a nice day. Go fight with someone else.
From a legal standpoint it might not be a bad idea to advertise the full payload rating.
Yeah they usually don’t tow faster 50mph.