Comanche Scott
Expedition Leader
I'm just going to stick with BCN it works great. Maybe if GAIA decides to do a trial version down the road, I'll look at it. But really no reason to switch currently.
Thanks a lot for making this happen (or posting the link at least) 1Louder. I just got a 2-year free membership since I paid for the old app and now a 1-month free trial. The MVUM layer is super useful of course..
One issue I've always experienced with Gaia is that map downloads of offline areas will not happen in the background. This is true of the new app as well. The speeds when it does continue to download are also abysmal. Wonder if this is a known issue already...
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk
IOS Question: Is the Gaia app/subscription user or device based?
Do I need to pay/buy the subscription twice if I want to use the app on the iPad and iPhone? Or does one purchase work on both?
IOS Question: Is the Gaia app/subscription user or device based?
Do I need to pay/buy the subscription twice if I want to use the app on the iPad and iPhone? Or does one purchase work on both?
No, it's not an online service. Not by a long shot. Downloading maps for a region you're interested in is a simple, one-time process. No different from a software update, really. Even accounting for bandwidth costs (which, these days, are incredibly low), I'd bet that Gaia's breakpoint for profitability (per average user) would be well below $100. Those NatGeo (or whatever they use) maps would be licensed from the provider at a far lower, bulk price than what you'd get charged for a one-off purchase. Just like movies and TV episodes that end up on Netflix, Hulu, etc.
There are plenty of mapping solutions that allow you to download maps. Some are even free. Many have excellent maps, with incredible level of detail.
I'd be perfectly happy to download maps once and forego further (free) updates. Heck, they can include a physical, 128GB USB stick with every single map on it and it won't cost more than an extra $20. There are plenty of cost-effective solutions, but they won't explore those so long as people are happy to be taken advantage of.
Not quite. When I buy something - anything - I expect it to be serviced during the warranty period, no more, no less. If a piece of software comes with a year of support and updates, that's great, and I wouldn't expect anything more. That's reasonable, and no different from the warranty on your car or toaster oven. What's more, and this is really the important bit, is that I can choose to disconnect said app from the world, not install updates, not have it talk to any home server, and simply... work.
Ensuring that the development company has finances does not benefit the consumer in any way. The company will either use that money to develop entirely new products (which will benefit the company way more than the consumer), or that money will end up in the top-management's pockets. That money will never be used to solely benefit the people shelling it out. Never. And if the company cannot stand behind their warranty (or whatever they promise) for the length of time they've committed to, well then that's no different from any other manufacturer not standing behind their claims, and is not the consumer's fault, but rather mismanagement at the company.
Subscription-based products always come with the internet tie-in. They require internet to phone home and regularly check the subscription status (which requires me to have said internet access, or at least regularly provide it), the manufacturer frequently gives themselves functionality to force updates (perhaps not the app itself - depending on Apple Store's policies - but definitely the data), to change or remove features at will. I don't want that. I don't want anyone to have control over the product I'm paying for except myself.
I paid around $60 or $70 for Navigon some 5-6 years ago, and guess what? It still works as it did, it's still an excellent piece of software, and is still one of the first apps I install on any new iOS device. In fact, for road-maps, it still can't be beat. And it's still getting updates (which I can choose to stop installing at any time). It was a large up-front cost, but clearly that business model is still working for that company, and they've got at least one very happy user. I don't believe that Gaia cannot profit from the same business model - they simply know that they'll profit more from a subscription. Just like every company that has ever tried to force people into contracts. It boils down to greed that's sold as a "this is for best you" lie. Same exact story as with Internet Service Providers, TV Providers, Cellphone Providers, Gyms, and all other companies that take advantage of their monopoly-like standing to force consumers into contracts they neither want, nor need.
Subscription-based models only benefit a sole party: the company selling the subscription.
I'm happy to subscribe to an online service (Netflix, Spotify, FreshBooks, GitHub, AWS, etc.), but as far as subscription-based, device-ran software goes, I view it same way I view heroin: not even once.