Nullifier
Expedition Leader
Ok so why is it with as much value that we all put on the products coming from australia and south africa, that the OME tacoma suspension is not viewed as a great choice. Granted I have not driven a taco with an OME suspension, but given the perameters OME uses to design there suspensions I can't see why they are not held in higher reguard.
Now I know alot of you guys like the 2.5 coilover systems because since it is a bigger resevior it holds more oil and cools better. This helps to control fade on long fast speed runs. I'm just wondering how many of you actually push your suspensions hard enough that it really becomes a factor. I know when I'm on a trail I'm moving pretty slow. Of course most of my trails are real tight, rocky, or laden with deep water crossing where you don't just dive in ya know. I guess on a baja run which I have not experienced yet you will drive everywhere on marginal roads and moderate speeds but if the OME suspension is suposedly designed for that type of terrain shouldn't it hold up?
Now the other part of this is you here so many people talking ********** about how the coils won't hold the wieght of a bullbar/winch. that it will "sag". is this for real? I can not imagine ARB/OME not designing a suspension that will hold up what they sell in the way of armour & accessories, as well as carry a load for extended trips like fore in the outback.
Now I know with rear shocks the debate of double walled construction builds heat but protects the shock body. Protection good, heat bad. I know that the deaver springs are more flexable the the OME springs and I understand that with out a doubt. I'm not so worried about the rear half of thier suspension. It's primarily the front that I'm interested.
Have any of you guys run OME then gone to a big coilover? This has been beat to death by the "rockcrawler types" but only minimal discussion here. Maybe I'm being a cheap ass but when I know so many good things about the ARB stuff and look at saving 1K+ that could be used for fridge, shower system etc I start to wonder if these high dollar suspension systems are truely needed for proper handling and trail performance, or it's more of a want to have and I got the $ so why not thing. I fully understand the money saved at time of purchase thing. I have had that lesson several times. So what's the scoop fellas.
Now I know alot of you guys like the 2.5 coilover systems because since it is a bigger resevior it holds more oil and cools better. This helps to control fade on long fast speed runs. I'm just wondering how many of you actually push your suspensions hard enough that it really becomes a factor. I know when I'm on a trail I'm moving pretty slow. Of course most of my trails are real tight, rocky, or laden with deep water crossing where you don't just dive in ya know. I guess on a baja run which I have not experienced yet you will drive everywhere on marginal roads and moderate speeds but if the OME suspension is suposedly designed for that type of terrain shouldn't it hold up?
Now the other part of this is you here so many people talking ********** about how the coils won't hold the wieght of a bullbar/winch. that it will "sag". is this for real? I can not imagine ARB/OME not designing a suspension that will hold up what they sell in the way of armour & accessories, as well as carry a load for extended trips like fore in the outback.
Now I know with rear shocks the debate of double walled construction builds heat but protects the shock body. Protection good, heat bad. I know that the deaver springs are more flexable the the OME springs and I understand that with out a doubt. I'm not so worried about the rear half of thier suspension. It's primarily the front that I'm interested.
Have any of you guys run OME then gone to a big coilover? This has been beat to death by the "rockcrawler types" but only minimal discussion here. Maybe I'm being a cheap ass but when I know so many good things about the ARB stuff and look at saving 1K+ that could be used for fridge, shower system etc I start to wonder if these high dollar suspension systems are truely needed for proper handling and trail performance, or it's more of a want to have and I got the $ so why not thing. I fully understand the money saved at time of purchase thing. I have had that lesson several times. So what's the scoop fellas.