I think I understand this. By increasing the stiffness of the coil springs or by increasing their length you are lowering the point in the wheel's range of travel that it comes to rest: This effectively raises the truck. You will thus decrease the amount the wheel can drop from this at-rest position and increase the amount it can rise.(the distance that the spring can compress) So it will require more force to push the wheel up to the point in its travel where the tire rubs but it will still rub in exactly the same place it did before the lift if there is enough force.
So, depending on where the tire is rubbing, wouldn't a body lift be more effective in increasing clearance around the tire? The body lift wouldn't help if the tire is rubbing on the upper control arm but it could help if the tire is rubbing inside the fender well.
Getting back to my question in my original post about replacing the UCA; do some manufacturers of after-market UCAs build them in such a way that they are out of the way of the larger tire?
Thanks to all of you for answering my questions and helping me to understand this.
You are on the right track. So, when the longer coil pushes the LCA down, it in turn pulls the UCA down as well via the spindle. This tips the tire out at the top. With a stock UCA, the only way to get the camber back is to adjust the LCA's out at the bottom. Caster is adjusted the same way, but being that the stock UCA is fixed, there is insufficient adjustment left to get proper camber/caster relationship. With the stock UCA tipped down, and the accompanying new larger tires, you now get rubbing on the UCA and binding in the upper ball joint during travel. (I had rubbing on the UCA with stock suspension and 265/75-16 on OEM rims)
Aftermarket UCA's tend to be shorter to make up for negative camber, upper ball joint positioned rearward for added caster, as well as having better articulating upper ball joints to gain back that lost down travel. Light Racing UCA's, have adjustability built in so you can do the majority of the alignment with the UCA and fine tune it with the LCA.
On the other hand, body lifts will most certainly get you additional clearance between body and chassis, but you do not gain any additional suspension travel, as you are still using OEM components. For most, this is probably adequate. The problem with body lifts is the change in relationship between body and chassis usually creates fitment issues with certain components like bumpers, shift linkage, radiator, etc, as well as, added stress on the body mounts. You do not gain any additional load carrying capacity or dampening with just the body lift. This is why you see most folks add a suspension lift with some type of trimming of the wheel wells and cab mounts. (Best of both worlds.)