Egan70
Observer
I have an M101A3 which I am building up in a separate thread. I added the DiamondBack cover because I liked the idea of a locked and weather tight trailer bed. I didn't think everything through as well as I should have because I am now running into issues while designing my RTT rack.
I want to be able to remove the front and rear cover sections while the rack is on the trailer. Each section is 41" long which means the rack bottom would have to be at 95" AFF or so to give me enough room to flip the covers up and remove them. I only need the rack at 78" AFF to put the Mt Rainier at the right height for the changing room to be optimal. The image below is my CAD drawing of my trailer. You can see that just to get the covers open enough for basic access (not for loading anything big) my final RTT height is about right. If I want the covers completely open where the struts are maxed out, I have to go up another 12" to 90" AFF.
My ideal stowed height for the bottom of the rack would have been around 65" AFF to help keep the drag down.
So, do I build a rack that can telescope from 65" to 78" and then again to 95"? Does this complicate strut sizing and add more bracing to the rack?
Do I just go with 65" and 78" and on the rare occasion I need to remove one or both covers for items too tall to fit under the cover, just remove the entire RTT rack? (I plan to put eyebolts in the top of the RTT rack so it and the RTT can be hoisted up, leaving only the base of the rack).
Here's my trailer and you can see how high up the cover goes:
Here's my CAD drawing painfully illustrating my dilemma:
I want to be able to remove the front and rear cover sections while the rack is on the trailer. Each section is 41" long which means the rack bottom would have to be at 95" AFF or so to give me enough room to flip the covers up and remove them. I only need the rack at 78" AFF to put the Mt Rainier at the right height for the changing room to be optimal. The image below is my CAD drawing of my trailer. You can see that just to get the covers open enough for basic access (not for loading anything big) my final RTT height is about right. If I want the covers completely open where the struts are maxed out, I have to go up another 12" to 90" AFF.
My ideal stowed height for the bottom of the rack would have been around 65" AFF to help keep the drag down.
So, do I build a rack that can telescope from 65" to 78" and then again to 95"? Does this complicate strut sizing and add more bracing to the rack?
Do I just go with 65" and 78" and on the rare occasion I need to remove one or both covers for items too tall to fit under the cover, just remove the entire RTT rack? (I plan to put eyebolts in the top of the RTT rack so it and the RTT can be hoisted up, leaving only the base of the rack).
Here's my trailer and you can see how high up the cover goes:
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v482/Egan70/M101A3/IMAG0095.jpg)
Here's my CAD drawing painfully illustrating my dilemma:
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v482/Egan70/M101A3/Rack%20Dilema.png)