Jonathan Hanson
Well-known member
The metallurgy of the SF shaft differs than that of the FF due to its need to axle as a bearing surface, a seal surface, a drive surface and a shear beam. Its generally accepted that they are a more brittle structure than the FF shafts.
Ah - now we're getting somewhere.This is what in knifemaking terminology is called the difference between strength and toughness. A steel high on the Rockwell scale of hardness, that will hold an edge well, is considered strong. A steel that can resist bending without breakage or chipping of the edge is considered tough. The two characteristics are rarely complementary. It makes sense that FF axles could be made of tougher steel than SF axles, since they don't experience the surface wear of the bearing load. A tougher axle would be more resistant to abrupt twisting stresses.
I'd be willing to bet this is the salient feature that would make FF axles less prone to breakage.
However, I'll also still maintain that for use other than severe rock crawling, the stock LC SF rear axle is plenty strong. The one in my FJ40 has 309,000 miles on it, and it has towed sailboats and kayak trailers for its living, in addition to a fair amount of technical trail use.