Sway Bar/Roll Stabilizer for IFS Vehilces-is it required by law for on-highway ops

Are sway bars required by law for on highway operation of IFS vehicles?


  • Total voters
    31

upcountry

Explorer
So this started out of curiosity. Many members here operate vehicles as daily drivers or recreational vehicles that see lots of on-highway miles that have a modified (improved and, well, better than that factory crap) IFS suspensions with the sway bar removed.

Question:

Is there a DOT/DMV or whatever your state calls their highway department law that REQUIRES IFS vehicles be equiped with a functional sway bar/roll stabilizer?

I ask this as i am, like many have, debating removing my sway bar.
 
Last edited:

Vantage

Adventurer
No. At least not here in Canada. I removed when I upgraded to OME suspension. I can't even tell its missing with the stiffer springs.
 

upcountry

Explorer
Well, a quick search of the good ol' Washington Administrative Code reveals that sway bars are not required in Washington State for FRONT SUSPENSION. They are howevor required for rear coil sprung vehicles.

So, if you are driving a vehicle with a rear coil spring suspension, a rear sway bar is required.

Otherwise, you have to meet the cone-swerve test requirements.


See http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=204-10-036

Which says:

WAC 204-10-036

Suspension.

A motor vehicle must be capable of stable, controlled operation while traversing a slalom-type path passing alternately to the left and right of at least four cones or markers arranged in a straight line and spaced sixty feet apart at a minimum speed of 25 mph.

Body lifts are permitted provided that they are manufactured by an aftermarket manufacturer, designed for the make and model vehicle on which they are installed, and installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Body lifts may not use more than a three-inch spacer and may not raise the body more than four inches above the frame when all components are installed.

A motor vehicle must:

(1) Have a minimum ground clearance to allow the vehicle to be in motion on its four rims on a flat surface with no other parts of the vehicle touching that surface and a maximum ground clearance determined based on the table contained in WAC 204-10-022 (6)(f) bumpers.

(2) Have spring mounts and shackles properly aligned and of sufficient strength so as to support the gross weight of the vehicle and provide free travel in an up and down movement under all conditions of operation.

(3) Incorporate antisway devices to control lateral movement in rear coil spring suspension systems.

(4) Have a suspension system that allows movement between the unsprung axles and wheels and the chassis body.

(5) Be equipped with a damping device at each wheel location. The dampening device must stop vertical body motion within two cycles when any corner of the vehicle is depressed and released.

(6) Be capable of providing a minimum relative motion of plus and minus two inches.

(7) Not use heating or welding for coil springs, leaf springs, or torsion bars.

(8) Not be constructed or loaded so that the weight on the wheels of any axle is less than thirty percent of the gross weight of the vehicle.

(9) Not raise or lower the height of a motor vehicle while the motor vehicle is traveling more than 15 mph on a public roadway with a posted speed limit of 25 mph or less. Except when lawfully participating in a parade permitted by local jurisdiction.

(10) At no time have any portion of any tire of such motor vehicle leave the surface of the roadway.

(11) Not have any portion of the vehicle or component of the hydraulic system used to raise or lower the vehicle cause or emit sparks.

Nothing in this section shall prohibit a county or city from enacting stricter regulations for aftermarket vehicle hydraulics on a public roadway.
 

ExploringNH

Explorer
In New Hampshire it is illegal to modify ANY component in the suspension. Any lifted truck is technically illegal.

Saf-C 3211.07Steering, Alignment and Suspension.
(a) A vehicle shall be rejected if:

(1) A spring, strut or torsion-bar height does not meet the manufacturer's specifications or there is a broken spring leaf, spring shackle, coil, sway bar or any connecting part;

Does that mean that it is enforced? No.
 

1 Bored Clerk

Explorer
(3) Incorporate antisway devices to control lateral movement in rear coil spring suspension systems.

The 'lateral movement' part of this statement would lead me to believe that a panhard rod is required or properly designed 4 link. I think the 'sway' (body lean) that a sway bar reduces is a different motion than 'lateral movement'. Seems to me that it's just a nod to the fact that you need some sort of lateral movement inhibitor on a rear coil sprung suspension for it to work at all.
 

keezer37

Explorer
I always consider liability when performing any modification. Were the worse to occur is there criminal or civil liability? Am I giving my insurer a way out?
 

Wainiha

Explorer
My sway bar is off. I bet Geico would use that against me if I got into an accident. I don't know the laws here concerning them, but I bet most wouldn't notice it was gone.
 

Crom

Expo this, expo that, exp
Too bad nobody makes quick disconnects for the front Tacoma anti-sway bar.
 

Utah KJ

Free State of Florida
My rear sway is removed and my front swaybar deals snapped the first time I took it to The Maze... that was 2 years ago. It shouldn't pass safety in UT.
 

Eric3187

Adventurer
i am a texas certified state inspector for everything except DOT (commercial vehicles) and sway bars are not part of the inspected items...

that said, can you get a ticket in texas for not having one? doubt it, but you also dont need a license plate to pass texas state inspection, but you can get a ticket for not having a license plate while driving...

my thought is if a LEO is going as far to check if you have a sway bar installed on your vehicle... you are already screwed as he is going to nit-pick your whole vehicle until he finds SOMETHING to give you a ticket over
 

upcountry

Explorer
So, I removed the sway bar. After many hours on the road, there really is no difference, only there is difference in how the front end droops on uneven surfaces and there is no longer an obnoxious creaking noise when the sway bar is fighting the suspension.

The only difference I can see is on off camber turns at high speed I feel a little more body roll. It's staying off!
 

Mrknowitall

Adventurer
The bigger challenge isn't whether or not it would it will pass a state inspection or be subject to roadside ticketing. The real concern is whether or not you expose yourself to greater liability, should you be involved in an accident. Then again, any modification to tires, suspension, brakes, raised CG, etc, could be considered willful defeating of safety features in court (by wrong weasel lawyer)
 

Brown Mike

New member
Ive had my sway bar off since I put my coilovers on a few years ago, with a tube bumper and soft coils its got very noticable roll compared to before. the main reason I didnt put it back on was the fact the bushings/end links were trashed and was going to be a pain to put back on.

I HIGHLY doubt even here in CA where they are Nazi's about DOT stuff, that someone would get a roadside ticket for not running one. I would also say its safe to assume that removing or altering any suspension components (or anything else) would be "illegal" and liable in an insurance dispute (as stated in the previous post).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,294
Messages
2,905,061
Members
229,959
Latest member
bdpkauai
Top