The Re-designed 2014 Range Rover Sport

[PETER PETRAKIEV]

....

[video=youtube;E-7GvLg07PA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=E-7GvLg07PA[/video]

 

[haven]

There's a configuration page for Range Rover Sport on the web site now
http://rules.config.landrover.com/j...a-se_a-std_a-std-wb_a-v6/n-873/jdxpayoff.html

SE Base vehicle, with supercharged V6, costs $64K. No low range in the base vehicle. Top of the range Autobiography about $95K. Or about $20K cheaper than big brother Range Rover.

 

[d67u57]

the sloping 'what up yo.me gangsta,ok?' roof gets me every time.

 

[m3 bavaria]

I love my Rovers, but I can't for the life of me see this as a better option than an E63 Estate...

 

[RoyJ]

(what girly man would be driving an auto anyway?).

Right..... because refusing to drive an auto when it's clearly superior, is the ultimate measure of manliness.

There're many great feats in this world that test the boundaries of a man, trust me, driving a stick is not one of them.

 

[d67u57]

lots of women drive stick so what?

apparently im the only one in my peer group that doesnt quite fancy the looks of this new rr.....

we must be few and far,i guess.

 

[REDROVER]

on expedition portal its politically incorrect to say
Hey that new range rover sport is cute little garbage with no low range t case . Haha

 

[spikemd]

Seriously? Despite the colour and a very slight similarity in the headlight design I dont see any other resemblances.

Really? They are so similar it makes me vomit.

The old RRS was different with clean defined lines which is why it was such a success. This new one looks ALMOST IDENTICAL to the Exploder. Sad...very sad..

 

[Funrover]

I have not seen one in person yet, but my initial response is NO! I am sure is can do a lot, but it's just ugly. I hope for LR it does well!