I agree with a lot of comments on here, SAS is going to be stronger no doubt, but you have to decide if its actually worth it. Even if your running 35" tires but just overlanding I think it would be ok, but i only have experience with FS GM IFS. I did my SAS because i was tired of wearing out my steering components, funny part is now i wear out steering boxes faster...gotta figure that out still. I run 37" tires and each tire/wheel combo weighs in at about 180 lbs. I wouldn't run those on any IFS vehicle because they are crazy heavy. They put strain on my current 1 ton TRE steering with 1.5" .250 DOM steering linkages.
I think it was Deuce who mentioned it, but there is a lot of associated costs too. If your SAS'ing for rock crawling or just beating the plain snot out of your truck, then bumpers, and other armor are going to join the mix. I fab my stuff up myself which means its not always the prettiest but saves me coin...still expensive though.
That being said, if you want to do it, just do it. Thats what i did, it wasn't particularly necessary but i thought it was cool and i'm glad i did it, wouldn't mind the cash back in my pocket either though. We just took our truck on another adventure and did some snow offroading, aired down and plowed through everything we wanted. The truck is a lot of fun and rides smoother than the IFS because i have it sprung especially soft for a large truck and spent lots of time building the suspension so it would act how i wanted it to. There are things i would change though if i could now though too including suspension design. Possibly go leaf spring as oppose to coilover, less maintenance, and you can get a leaf spring to run soft and smooth especially with some good $$$ invested in shocks.
Just do your suspension research and figure out what system you want to run as it fits your needs. Looking forward to a potential SAS build and certainly a diesel swap, that'll be sweet.