grain_of_salt
Member
I agree 1000% that vagabond’s are a superior product to GFC but there is absolutely no excuse anymore. There are so many campers now that offer a plethora of options (windows, doors, awnings, etc.) for multiple truck models and are at the same level or very close to VO‘s build quality. Most of which can produce campers anywhere from 8 to 16 weeks. Topo, Snap!, AT, Camp King, Trailfort, and even Alu-Cab come to mind as companies with a high build quality that can get you a camper in less than a year. All of these companies’ wait times have only declined since their inception whereas VO’s has continued to increase. Thats not how it’s supposed to work.
I agree that VO build quality (esp when including the price point) is top tier and even that Phil really wants to best camper for his customer. The problem is that these campers no longer have the niche market they did prior to COVID. More companies are producing campers which means there are more options. It’s no longer GFC and Vagabond with a bunch of “emerging” companies. VO is now at the point where they are undeniably losing customers to other competing companies and doesn’t seem to care or be doing much to change that. As a customer who has invested in their product, this worries me.
I honestly would prefer they raise prices if it meant they could reduce production times.
GFC owner here, which was purchased when Vagabond went dark after my deposit. Can confirm that Vagabond is not only a superior product, but a very different product. Independent of wait times (which is being beaten to death as an obvious difference). It's definitely flimsier construction with floppy doors and a honeycomb top rather than aluminum (not sure it would survive a roll), but mine has stood up to a pretty proper thrashing on 4wd trails. Not a great winter camper for us weak stock and the sleeping platform is too short for tall folks. Almost zero options available, with a few exceptions, such as the awning mounts. I have my Vagabond place in line (I'm assuming? Who knows) still for a reason. But I can't sleep in a place in line.
That said, I have trouble crapping on Go Fast. The GFC is unapologetically a minimalist product and the light weight of the v2 reflects that. What, 270 lbs? It's crazy. When I emailed them questions? They actually had a person who answered them promptly and was really nice about it. I had an install date 4 months in advance, literally down to the hour, and they didn't ******** around and make me waste my vacation time.
They don't pretend to be what they are not, answering the questions of "Hey! When are you going to add an XYZ option?" with "Never. Not what this camper is supposed to be." Have they had serious design flaws? No arguments there. I feel like the dudes tried their best to stand by their product and fix them, however. I'm not sure I have that confidence in Phil, no matter how much people seem to think he's a "good guy." There's someone on TW that had warping Frontrunner panels and a botched powdercoat on the Drifter that hasn't been able to reach VO any better than the rest of us.
Again, re-iterating, Drifter is the product that I ultimately want for my purposes, but had to stand up for GFC. I think their tents are great for a lot of people and think they try to be an upstanding company. If you're looking for something super simple, light, and minimalist to keep weight down, with almost zero wait time, I think it's a fine option.
Last edited: