Wheel Spacers; Good or Bad?

Chad Swaffard

New member
Hey all,

I am thinking about adding wheel spacers to my 2016 JK Unlimited Rubicon. I installed a Teraflex 2.5" lift and right now it still has the stock 255/75/17. I want a bigger over all tire (possibly 35's) but I want to keep my stock Rubicon rims. The factory back-spacing will probably not allow a tire that size on it without rubbing so that's when the wheel spacer idea came to me. I have run wheel spacers on all of my Polaris Rangers without any problems ever, but the Jeep is twice the weight of my crew fully loaded.

Any experience out there?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0902.jpg
    IMG_0902.jpg
    576 KB · Views: 48
  • IMG_0908.jpg
    IMG_0908.jpg
    601.4 KB · Views: 46
  • IMG_0905.jpg
    IMG_0905.jpg
    592.6 KB · Views: 48

Blue Baby Sound

A guy with a Jeep
This kind of spacer/adapter is bad:

mrg-2371_ml.jpg




This kind of spacer/adapter is OK:

sptwhs010_01



I run a spidertrax spacer on the wife's with no issues. Teraflex 2.5" lift, Rancho CA brackets, spidertrax 1.75" spacer with 315/70/17 Duratracs.






 
Last edited:

Chad Swaffard

New member
Your Jeep looks good. Thank you for the input. I would think that applying the correct tourque and checking them at every tire rotation would work.
 

Blue Baby Sound

A guy with a Jeep
Thanks, so does yours!
Red thread locker on install. When you check torque set it a little lower than the original install as to not break the thread locker.
Wife's is 15k as pictured with no backing off of the spacers.
 

NMC_EXP

Explorer
Seems to me that shifting the tire outboard will put more load on bearings and any other rotating parts in the hub.
 

Burb One

Adventurer
I have spacers, because I like my stock wheel on my suburban. Eventually I will get properly backspaced wheels.

Spacers are not the ideal situation. It's just another spot something can fail. Saying that, the quality ones with studs are fine. Make sure they are properly installed at torque with red locktite, and I recheck them every 10k ish.

Also, with "properly backspaced wheels" technically the spacers and a properly backedspace wheel will put the lever arm on the bearings/ hub etc. at the same point, because both move the mass of the tire/wheel out to the same point. Spacers might be a tad worse, because they add a bit of mass, as the mass of the wheel portion it contacts will be at the end of the spacer, so more mass of the wheel will be further out instead of without spacers, where that wheel mass will be where the "spacer" would be, but that's negligible.
 
Last edited:

Blue Baby Sound

A guy with a Jeep
Seems to me that shifting the tire outboard will put more load on bearings and any other rotating parts in the hub.

You're correct, but when going wider on tires there's no other choice. Backspace must be decreased by a wheel with lower backspace or a spacer. In the case of my wife's Jeep 4.5" BS was the goal. Factory wheel was 6.25", we used a 1.75" spacer to get to our goal.

My Jeep went from a 10.5" wide tire to a 13.5" wide tire. Wheel/tire weight increased from the factory 65 pounds to 134. Factory unit bearings lasted about 40k. The wife's Jeep is an 85 pound combo, I expect 80-100k out of hers.
 

Fishrising

Observer
Hi there, I am running 285/75/17 (33.8x11.2 by math, actually says 34x11.5 on the tire as well) Falken Wildpeak A/T3Ws with 1.5" Spidrertrax spacer on my JKU with a 1.75" Rock Krawler Budget Boost.

They measure just under 33.25" tall and a hair over 11" wide at 33ish PSI.

Here is before versus after (255/75/17 stock KMs vs 285/75/7 A/T3W), without the spacers:

falk001.jpg


falk002.jpg


falk003.jpg


falk004.jpg


falk005.jpg


The spare mounted, before I added back my bike rack and a washer on each stud (now the tire doesn't touch the 3rd brake light):

falk006.jpg


And here is with the wheel spacers installed, the tires barely stick out past the stock fenders, and tuck in nicely when articulated. Before wheelspacers the front tires rub on the sway bar at full turn in reverse. After the wheel spacers were installed they rubbed on the front air dam. Cutting out a 5"x5" square out of the end of the air dam alleviated that problem.

falk008.jpg


falk009.jpg


falk010.jpg


So, the spacers helped me alleviate some tire rubbing, then introduced some more (which I rectified), and gave the Jeep a better look in my opinion. I also have a sneaking suspension, articulation wise, I will do better in my current setup with the spacers than without. I too like the stock Rubicon wheels, and did not want the added expense of new wheels, so the spacers are working for me. Just make sure you install them per manufacturers specs....
 

SilicaRich

Wandering Inverted
I would say as long as you don't run any absurd spacer width you should be good. Also, make sure when mounting the spacer it is flush (rubber mallet helps) and you use Loctite.
 
I have run the spider trax 1.5" for 50k issue free miles, Its all about making sure you install them correctly. Its scary seeing some come in with the acorn nuts backwards!
 

kojackJKU

Autism Family Travellers!
I have run the spider trax 1.5" for 50k issue free miles, Its all about making sure you install them correctly. Its scary seeing some come in with the acorn nuts backwards!

SAY WHA? thats unbelievable. I ran a set of teraflexes for 150,000. No issues.
 

DaveNay

Adventurer
I have run the spider trax 1.5" for 50k issue free miles, Its all about making sure you install them correctly. Its scary seeing some come in with the acorn nuts backwards!
How do you put an acorn nut on backwards???

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,310
Messages
2,905,298
Members
229,959
Latest member
bdpkauai
Top