DT75FLH
Adventurer
Which would you choose ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you had a choice, for mild trails and overnighters/overlanding.....
a 2000 7.3 excursion?
a 98-02 dodge ECSB with the 5.9
7.3 f-350 CCSB pickup in the 250-350 variety.
The excursion with a mild lift 2-4" and 33-35 in tires ...I could throw the dogs and the wife in and go..
the pickups would require a flipac or similar cap ......
I have a rock crawler ..this would be for the Mohave trail etc.....
I like both engines and am not afraid of some miles due to there both B10 rated med duty engines....
both trucks have mild tranny issues....
and the Dodge's hold there value and are more expensive right out of the box...
and I found a decent excursion for a fair price and has 155k on it.
my concern with the excursion would be too much body flex? should i worry?
at least with the PU, the cab and bed have some flexibility independent of each other..
well....waddya all think?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you had a choice, for mild trails and overnighters/overlanding.....
a 2000 7.3 excursion?
a 98-02 dodge ECSB with the 5.9
7.3 f-350 CCSB pickup in the 250-350 variety.
The excursion with a mild lift 2-4" and 33-35 in tires ...I could throw the dogs and the wife in and go..
the pickups would require a flipac or similar cap ......
I have a rock crawler ..this would be for the Mohave trail etc.....
I like both engines and am not afraid of some miles due to there both B10 rated med duty engines....
both trucks have mild tranny issues....
and the Dodge's hold there value and are more expensive right out of the box...
and I found a decent excursion for a fair price and has 155k on it.
my concern with the excursion would be too much body flex? should i worry?
at least with the PU, the cab and bed have some flexibility independent of each other..
well....waddya all think?