I'm betting you were using a winch in a very controlled recovery- not putting a springy inertia strap on there and yanking the hell out of it. JATE rings are not rated for inertial recoveries. The bolts are smaller than the cross-pin on the previously debated hitches.
Actually, except for "field expedients", Kinetic Rope recoveries were forbidden for non-armoured vehicles. For one thing, it was too hard to control when the ropes should be retired, and the accident rate was very high.
But no matter what the recovery technique, if Jate Rings were available, they were the correct pair of attachment points (in preference to dual D-rings, even if both were fitted).
Btw, Jate rings are certainly not to be confused with the standard lashing eyes that are fitted to Land Rovers, front and rear. Those
are just for tying down the truck!
I'm not sure how to answer your reasonable-sounding argument that the receiver hitch pin is much bigger than Jate Ring bolts. It might be that the pair of bolts are tightly fitted, and the pull isn't in the centre of the bolts, as it is with the pin. Or it might be that the pin isn't actually the weak point of the receiver hitch (which was my contention all along). Either way, I have never heard of Jate rings failing, except when the bolts have been corroded almost completely through.
KE straps, like all recovery equipment, have their place. They do work really slick at the right time. I became a true believer the first time I saw one used the right way. It looked as if it happened in slow motion!
There's no question about how effective KERRs are! And if there were no other option, then I'd use one. But it would be a last resort, for me. Too much guess-work, too little control, too much potential for vehicle and equipment damage, and too dangerous.