Any overhead lifting must be labeled on the product.
Overhead is more than
having a label. The label attached has specific information relating to an accepted standard, in the United States that being ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) B30 series adopted as a ANSI (American National Standards Institute) standard.
ANSI/ASTM standards are recognized nationally as binding legal documents under regulatory bodies when used for industrial overhead rigging, on ships, railroads and any other number of applications. It's not a matter of choice, there is liability or at least punitive consequences if you don't follow them in these situations.
We leverage these standards for vehicles to the extent that they provide guidance in design margin and testing but they aren't necessarily directly applicable. A polyester tow strap like this would fall under ASME B30.9 for lifting slings but how we're using them isn't really the same, so the limits are rather arbitrary. I don't honestly know if there's a sling/strap ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) standard for rating recovery rigging used like this such as exists to grade transport chain or synthetic cargo tie-down webbing.
None-the-less, a B30.9 single ply polyester web sling 2" wide would carry various working load limits such as vertical hitch, which is essentially how we rig straps connecting an eye to each vehicle then straight pulling. Rigging straps might also be used in a basket or choke configuration, which have different ratings.
Per the standard a synthetic sling is required to carry a design factor of 5, which is the ratio of breaking to working strength, and be subject to a proof test of 2 x WLL. So an example 3,100 lbf WLL sling would be designed to break at 15,500 lbs and have been tested (and could be again at any time) to 6,200 lbf without damage.
Just a random 2", single ply sling example:
https://boiserigging.com/product/2-eye-eye-sling-one-ply-ee1-902/
I suspect that's the very, very lose root of the numbers this Home Depot strap claims. IOW 15,000 lbs max load is the material breaking and 7,000 lbf would probably be (perhaps optimistically, I'd think) what they think is proof - the point it would tear stitching or start to stretch permanently.
What it says on the web page is “max 15,000 # max vehicle rating”. I believe that the wording is wrong. It contradicts itself.
“Easy to store in a trunk, job box or behind a tuck seat, each strap has a 7,000 lb. working load capacity with a 15,000 lb. max vehicle weight.”
As I said earlier I will need to see and experiment with this. I will be honest it is made in China and if they have contradicting information, what is it really. I think that the 15,000# is the max. load the strap can handle. I do not know if this has a safety margin in it or not?
What we came up with was this may work for light weight vehicles (vehicles weighing less the 4,000 #’s). With it being polyester.
I assume your 4,000 lbf guidance is therefore based on that line of reasoning? If so, why not 3,000 (design margin 5 x 3k = 15k) or 3,500 (proof 2 x 3.5k = 7k) instead?