kcowyo said:
It makes more financial sense to me to pay $4K or less, for an equally capable FJ62, in good condition with 160K miles. Same rep, same quality, same heritage, same aftermarket support, etc. I don't think the 62's are quite the lookers that the 80's are, but I like Toyota's oddball offerings best anyway.
I am afraid I am going to have to disagree with you on this one.
I have owned both models for a long period of time, and the 80 series is far superior on many aspects.
More comfort, more power, safer (airbags), less noisy, power everything, etc. It's a more modern SUV, but still build like a tank. The major downsides are gas mileage, parts are a bit more expensive and no manual transmission (in the US).
The FJ62 looks nice in my opinion, it's a bit smaller for offroad and parts/add-ons are less expensive. But at 160000 miles you may be looking for a head gasket (happened on mine) and a rebuild tranny.
I even bought a FJ62 after my relationship at the time ended with my ex-girlfriend keeping the 80.... Bad decision. After I added the ARB bull bar, Kaymar rear bumper, long range fuel tank, roof rack, roof top tent, etc, it became totally underpowered and gas mileage was barely touching 2 digits. It was a real challenge to climb sand dunes, as the truck did not have enough power.
My original plan was to use the 62 for our RTW trip but I ended up selling it on Ebay. I should have started with a 80 as a platform. Live and learn.
Furthermore, you can get a 80 with both diff locks. I don't know if they are as good as the ARBs, but to add 2 diff locks on a 62 will cost you almost $2K.
If I had to choose one again, I would go with the 80 in a minute. It is such a sweet ride.
I agree that they are expensive, but not over-inflated.
Depending where you are located, you can find them on Craiglist for $8-9$