TerraLiner:12 m Globally Mobile Beach House/Class-A Crossover w 6x6 Hybrid Drivetrain

java

Expedition Leader
Hate to say it but I think every woman will be different.

That being said I really like the layout of the Bambi, good use of space. And my Woman love having a permanent bed. Not setting it up, no losing the dinette etc. An I have to agree its nice, and It can double as a quick spot to dump jackets etc during travel.
 

optimusprime

Proffessional daydreamer.
As a general rule in the Uk, you do not 'own' a portable gas cylinder. It belongs to the company who's name is on the bottle. No garage in the uk will refill a gas cylinder for you, nor allow you to refill one on their premises.
As a general rule you cannot exchange a cylinder of one company,at a another supplier.
All gas bottles need the relevant British/European safety markings otherwise no one will (legally) touch them.
When transporting cylinders in the uk,they must be stored upright and in a compartment seperated from the passenger compartment, and importantly they must NOT be connected to any appliance whilst travelling.( little known fact that,even over here) Bottles must be secure and not be carried on the outside of the vehicle. ( rear mounts are a big no no.)
 

optimusprime

Proffessional daydreamer.
I would have to say (ref the women comment further up) that they just have a different set of priorities to men. I look at stuff,my wife looks at it and says ... 'Yes,but it's not very practical is it?' Or ' where am I going to put/do/take 'etc etc
If you can design something that understands women,you' ll be a very very rich man!!!!!!

My 14yr old daughter,not into girly stuff, bit of a tomboy,likes old land rovers etc ... But even she likes a hot bath and a comfy bed,plus being able to shut the world out at night.

what's the saying? You 'll never please all of the people all of the time?
 

biotect

Designer
As a general rule in the UK, you do not 'own' a portable gas cylinder. It belongs to the company who's name is on the bottle. No garage in the uk will refill a gas cylinder for you, nor allow you to refill one on their premises.

As a general rule you cannot exchange a cylinder of one company, at a another supplier.

Hi optimusprime,

Yes, I'd heard that; that's exactly why LPG seems so confusing, and why I asked the question.

So what exactly is Gaslow selling, with its "direct fill" cylinders?? Again, see http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...ops/cyujrhdmmu67/Categories/Cylinders/Buy_Now , http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...jrhdmmu67/Categories/Cylinders/Filling_Advice , http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...mu67/Categories/Cylinders/Further_Information , and http://www.gaslowdirect.com/WebRoot...Gallery/A4_LEAFLET_Direct_Fill_Refillable.pdf .

And what to make of Gaslow's map "showing all LPG Filling Stations that have confirmed that they will fill the Direct Fill Cylinder"?:


Gaslow LPG Filling Stations 1.jpg


See http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...ujrhdmmu67/Categories/Cylinders/Where_to_Fill and http://batchgeo.com/map/f7837320399df8ec4297483f603c9cfb . For other "refilling" (if one can call it that?) in other European countries, see http://www.iwemalpg.com/LPGstations.htm , http://stations.gpl.online.fr/appli/index.php , http://www.autogas-forum.de/lpg-stations/d-new-stations.htm , http://www.autogas-forum.de/lpg-stations/l-lpg-stations.htm , http://mlocek.sweb.cz/svedsko.html , http://www.jaquet-ge.ch/gaz/stations_gpl.php , http://stations.gpl.online.fr/appli/index.php , etc.

On the "High Altitude Heating Solutions" thread DiploStrat recently provided a link to the excellent "Travelin-Tortuga" website, whose vehicle webpage in turn contains a link to a pdf that the Hackneys produced, titled "Propane Systems for Expedition Vehicles" -- see http://www.travelin-tortuga.com/Travelin-Tortuga/ , http://www.travelin-tortuga.com/Travelin-Tortuga/our-vehicle/ , http://tortugaphoto.smugmug.com/Tigers-Family-Album/ , and http://www.hackneys.com/travel/docs/propane4xvehicles.pdf .

This is exactly the kind of document I was looking for. The mere existence of this document suggests that the use of propane in an expedition vehicle, of the kind that will cross multiple national borders, is indeed puzzling for many people, and not just me.....:).... So with any luck this pdf should answer most of my questions.

All best wishes,



Biotect
 
Last edited:

pugslyyy

Expedition Vehicle Engineer Guy
As a general rule in the Uk, you do not 'own' a portable gas cylinder. It belongs to the company who's name is on the bottle. No garage in the uk will refill a gas cylinder for you, nor allow you to refill one on their premises.
As a general rule you cannot exchange a cylinder of one company,at a another supplier.

This sounds similar to the system for the larger (home use) propane tanks in the US... I have a 250 gallon tank in my back yard that is owned by the company that fills it. In fact, they were just at my house this week putting a fresh coat of paint on it (they do stuff like that in the summer when they aren't running as many deliveries, it's a way to get their drivers some hours on the clock)
 

optimusprime

Proffessional daydreamer.
Hi optimusprime,

Yes, I'd heard that; that's exactly why LPG seems so confusing, and why I asked the question.

So what exactly is Gaslow selling, with its "direct fill" cylinders?? Again, see http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...ops/cyujrhdmmu67/Categories/Cylinders/Buy_Now , http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...jrhdmmu67/Categories/Cylinders/Filling_Advice , http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...mu67/Categories/Cylinders/Further_Information , and http://www.gaslowdirect.com/WebRoot...Gallery/A4_LEAFLET_Direct_Fill_Refillable.pdf .

And what to make of Gaslow's map "showing all LPG Filling Stations that have confirmed that they will fill the Direct Fill Cylinder"?:


View attachment 230911


See http://www.gaslowdirect.com/epages/...ujrhdmmu67/Categories/Cylinders/Where_to_Fill and http://batchgeo.com/map/f7837320399df8ec4297483f603c9cfb . For other "refilling" (if one can call it that?) in other European countries, see http://www.iwemalpg.com/LPGstations.htm , http://stations.gpl.online.fr/appli/index.php , http://www.autogas-forum.de/lpg-stations/d-new-stations.htm , http://www.autogas-forum.de/lpg-stations/l-lpg-stations.htm , http://mlocek.sweb.cz/svedsko.html , http://www.jaquet-ge.ch/gaz/stations_gpl.php , http://stations.gpl.online.fr/appli/index.php , etc.

On the "High Altitude Heating Solutions" thread DiploStrat recently provided a link to the excellent "Travelin-Tortuga" website, whose vehicle webpage in turn contains a link to a pdf that the Hackneys produced, titled "Propane Systems for Expedition Vehicles" -- see http://www.travelin-tortuga.com/Travelin-Tortuga/ , http://www.travelin-tortuga.com/Travelin-Tortuga/our-vehicle/ , http://tortugaphoto.smugmug.com/Tigers-Family-Album/ , and http://www.hackneys.com/travel/docs/propane4xvehicles.pdf .

This is exactly the kind of document I was looking for. The mere existence of this document suggests that the use of propane in an expedition vehicle, of the kind that will cross multiple national borders, is indeed puzzling for many people, and not just me.....:).... So with any luck this pdf should answer most of my questions.

All best wishes,



Biotect

Just been looking at that Gaslow site.
I notice it says they 'install' the kit into a caravan/camper.
That then takes it out of the 'portable' cylinder definition,as it's now a fixture of the vehicle.
So a filling station would then treat like an LPG powered vehicle.
(I could just see the look on their faces as you dragged an empty cylinder to the gas dispenser) they'd have a fit!!
 

Gizmo-sam

New member
Man Kat version and cost

hi

I have started reading this forum as Bev and I will be travelling the world in about 2-3 years, as I retire. We want to go to practical places. More bad road than off road. the designs and ingenuity of people are stunning, and we have so enjoyed talking to people about their experiences and adventures. Having discussed this for a while we have decided upon a self build with the primary aim of building something that serves as a secure home.

So the pre-requisites we have at the moment are

a) A torsion free base
b) a low cab line
c) the ability to go bad road
d) a 5th wheeler caravan habitation unit (without wheels, and possibly without chassis), fixed to a flat bed, with the sleeping pod of the 5th wheeler overhanging the cab
e) slidaeouts for the 5th wheeler (we won't buy anything other than with slideouts)
f) A panel base to cover the 5th wheeler, with security features built into the space between the panels and the 5th wheeler

At the end of this process we are looking to build a thing that looks like a truck, with panel sides which gull wing out, allowing the slideouts to come out

Our thinking is we can buy a 5th wheeler which is comfortable, and which is already designed. A truck which will last 5-10 years around the world, and looking acceptable and unprepossessing wherever we go.

we have seen MAN trucks for sale but get very little idea of the cost. The MOD sales people offered one for £42000, and another for 17,500.

Any thoughts about viability of ideas, ideas, suggestions or just good old advice will be welcome

Meanwhile I'll keep reading the forum

Steve and Bev
 

biotect

Designer
.
hi

....a 5th wheeler caravan habitation unit (without wheels, and possibly without chassis), fixed to a flat bed, with the sleeping pod of the 5th wheeler overhanging the cab


Hi Steve and Bev,

Are you thinking of something kind of like this?:


cache_2421387723.jpg...............................


See http://www.reisemobil-reparatur.de/xterra-expeditionvehicles-von-4x4-bis-8x8/ and http://translate.google.co.uk/trans...de/xterra-expeditionvehicles-von-4x4-bis-8x8/ . It was first posted by egn in the "Define America" thread, post #38 at http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/48137-Hemtt-Define-America-Project/page4 (if you use standard ExPo pagination). So if this is what you're looking for, you'll have egn to thank....:)

Intermodal shipping containers of the kind shown above have not only transformed world trade, they've also come to dominate military logistics support. You would not believe the variety of containers now possible; see for instance http://www.seabox.com/military.php . For military intermodal containers that expand with double slide-outs, thereby tripling interior space, see http://www.seabox.com/catalog/flyers/sb3800.0.2ggp.pdf , http://www.seabox.com/catalog/flyers/sb841.0.3s1.pdf , http://www.seabox.com/catalog/flyers/sb3892.0.3s1.pdf , and http://www.seabox.com/catalog/flyers/sb3800.0.2aap.pdf :


exp1.jpg


But this is no longer a "fifth" wheel solution; it's something else. Fifth wheel implies a truck towing a separate, wheeled trailer; and for "bad-road" applications, this will usually mean a gooseneck hitch, as per horse-trailers. Torsion-free design really only "makes sense" if one wants a Class-A type fully-integrated motorhome, with a unibody design. Otherwise, there's really no need for torsion free.

All best wishes,


Biotect
 
Last edited:

Gizmo-sam

New member
Hi Biotect

That is an interesting thought. However, what we'll end up with is a container that we would have to fit out. Both of us expect to really downsize into the space. To some extent we are looking forward to getting rid of all the "stuff" we own, butt we do not want to go Basic.

The idea of the 5th Wheeler is to get a good level of fit out, with not too shabby internals (Ok, they may not be an exact match for what we want), but the work will already have been done to make them a big space with bed, kitchen, wiring, plumbing etc fitted. The 5th wheeler idea is a possible way of buying a good fit-out at a reasonable level of comfort and everything that fits

My intention is to buy the truck (pre electronic) and the 5th wheeler. Strip (or build) the truck to a flat bed. Demount the 5th wheeler from either its wheels or chassis (I may have to keep the chassis on for structural integrity), then hoist the 5th wheeler onto the back of the truck, slide the projecting end of the 5th wheeler over the cab of the truck, so that the sleeping quarters are over the cab, and thus reducing the overall length of the of the vehicle. Then permanently fix the new 5th wheeler to the flat bed. So no towing!!

By doing this we could get a 25 - 30 foot habitation on a solid truck relatively quickly and without having to resort to a shed load of cutting, forming, moulding and fitting of internals.

My concern is how we that will operate on a truck base. The reason I like the MAN Kat is that it comes in a torsion free design. I do not know if I can get the right type in the UK, or whether I have to consider something with pivots points on the flat bed. As the 5th wheeler is rigid, and as it's snout will project over the cab, I am unsure whether I can integrate the snout with the top of the cab, or whether there has to be a gap between them. I thought that the torsion free aspect of the MAN would allow me to fix the cab to the snout somehow. But then again how would we get to the engine?? (I think the cab tips forward to expose the power unit, in which case the snout has to be free to allow the cab to tilt)

As we do not intend going off road, but mostly good roads and "bad" roads, I don't think we will stress the truck too much, but I do not want to buckle or break the habitation.

From this you can probably gather that this is VERY early stages in our thinking. We have given a year to design and ponder on the vehicles. We do not have a great deal of money for the habitation. I mentally put together £80k to buy the truck, 5th wheeler and integrating the two with tanks and storage included. I am thinking sub 20k for the truck, 15k for the 5th wheeler, 15k for the panels around it and 15-20k to make the truck sound and integrated with the habitation, leaving 10k - 15k contingency. Given that it and anything that comes thereafter may have to last for up to 10 years, that seems reasonable. I expect to buy the truck in July next year, and the 5th wheeler in the caravan low season (about November)

Once the two are in place I intend cladding the outside of the 5th wheeler and the truck with panelling and make it look as inconspicuous as possible. (I haven't quite thought of how the slideouts will come out with panels on the outside). Between the two will be an extra level of security and insulation built in. E.g. strong concertina doors across thresholds

I could go on, but would appreciate views from people. Thanks for taking time to answer

Steve and Bev

Mind you with the way the world is going to hell in a handbasket, and the cost of Carnets, I wonder if it would be better to dig a deep hole and live there!!
 

biotect

Designer
Hi Steve and Bev,

OK, now I understand.

It's an interesting solution; wonder if it has ever been tried?

It makes perfect sense. After all, why build a completely new habitation box, if instead one can buy a fifth-wheel camper-box ready-made and in good condition for only half the price (or less) of a new one. Note that you could probably still mount a stripped-down, "wheel-less" camper-box on top of a pivoting three-point sub-frame, and thereby go with a more standard sort of twisting truck frame. But as you suggest, if you want the camper box to cantilever over the cab, as per a fifth wheel, then you need a torsion-free frame. So a used MAN-KAT is the obvious choice.

If you can pull it off, at the very least you will have a very original vehicle: a fully integrated MAN-KAT conversion, with slide-outs. As far as I know, no such vehicle currently exists.

As for engine access, in the older MAN-KATs the engine locates behind the cab, not under it, as per the newer HX models. The true technology successor of the MAN KAT is the SX-series, not the HX-series. HX models are really just militarized TGA trucks. Whereas SX-series models have torsion-free frames, and the engine mounts behind the cab, just like the older MAN-KATs. See earlier in this thread, where all of this is explained in mind-numbing detail…..:sombrero:

Now as far as I know the MAN KAT cab must still tilt forwards to provide comprehensive engine-access. But the engine locates to one side, allowing a spare tire to sit lengthwise on the other side. So in the MAN KAT conversion for sale that was posted earlier in this thread, they removed the tire, and put in a corridor that directly links the cab with the camper box:


Crawl Through.jpg


For more images, see http://www.expedition-trucks.com/brokers/man-kat-6x6-expedition-truck , http://www.doleoni.com/wp/en/ , and http://www.doleoni.com/wp/#portfolio .

This corridor seems very original, because in large expedition vehicles usually the cab links to the camper-box via a kind of "bendy-bus", bellows-type rubber pass-through. It has to be bendy, because in most large expedition vehicles the underlying frame twists. When driving over rough terrain the cab goes one way, and the camper-box goes the other.... Whereas the corridor pictured above is decidedly not a bellows-type pass-through. As near as I can tell, this corridor is full height where it meets the camper box, but becomes crouching-height immediately behind the seats in the cab, probably because the the ceiling of the MAN KAT cab is so low. MAN KATs are military vehicles that must have low cab ceilings, to allow air-transportability. But this consideration does not apply for expedition motorhomes, so you could probably configure the corridor differently, by raising the ceiling of the MAN KAT cab.

In the next week or so I plan on doing a series of posts that cover this camper in detail, because it is one of the most "integrated" MAN-KAT conversion I've yet seen, and certainly one of the most elegant and sophisticated. However, there does still seem to be a break between the cab and the camper, perhaps so as to allow the cab to tilt forwards, or raise vertically?:


MAN KAT 6x6 Integrated1.jpg MAN KAT 6x6 Integrated2.jpg MAN KAT 6x6 Integrated3.jpg
MAN KAT 6x6 Integrated6.jpg MAN KAT 6x6 Integrated7.jpg MAN KAT 6x6 Integrated8.jpg


Sure, it's nothing like the huge gap with bendy-bus pass-through that characterizes most large expedition campers. But it's a break nonetheless.

I am not certain whether the cab of this MAN-KAT tilts forwards or rises vertically. But note that the additional pieces that surround the cab were constructed separately from the camper box:


Camper Box MAN KAT.jpg Cab MAN KAT1.jpg


On the other hand, the following image suggests that the engine, or at least the air-intake on the roof, can be accessed from the top of the cab:


Cab MAN KAT2.jpg


And who knows, perhaps enough access to the engine could be provided via panels that open on the sides, such that the cab would no longer have to be tilted forwards or otherwise raised? Because again, in a MAN KAT the engine sits behind the cab, not under it.

I don't know the answer to any of these questions. One regular participant on ExPo who might know the answers, is egn. You might try writing egn a private message, if he does not respond in this thread in the next week or two. Or you might also try writing to DeLeoni, who did the conversion, at:

  • FEDERICA GASPARATO
  • 0039-347-2286045
  • via Roma 80/B - 31020 Villorba (TV)
  • info@doleoni.com
Many thanks for posting in this thread, because yours is a very interesting idea, one that never occurred to me.

Just curious: what fifth-wheel campers have you looked into? Which ones appeal to you the most, and why? Please feel free to post at length in this thread, because your whole line of thinking is completely relevant to its central concern or "theme". And if you do write to Doleoni, please let us know their response here on ExPo, OK?

All best wishes,



Biotect
 
Last edited:

red EOD veteran

Adventurer
egn,

As 109 Pretender wrote in the “Hemtt Define America Project” thread, in the United States there are indeed laws that would prevent this. In the United States the laws that would prevent this are so stringent, that they even seem to have undermined the very possibility of a robust American second-hand market for used, ex-military vehicles:


Biotect

New guy to the forum and curious about this. With the regulations here in the US making it difficult to own one of these, what about one of the military surplus options that we do have, the 5 ton M934 6x6? They are plentiful here, no regulation restrictions with them either. Wouldn't they be a good option for those in the US? They are also very cheap.
 

biotect

Designer
.
Hi red EOD veteran,

Yes, I've wondered about that too – see http://olive-drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_m934.php :


id_m934_01_700.jpg id_m934_02_700.jpg


"M934" seems to be the name of the previous generation of Oshkosh "medium" tactical trucks with a CBE (cab-behind-engine) configuration, a lineage that is now called the "MTVR", right? See http://oshkoshdefense.com/products/medium-tactical-vehicles/ and http://oshkoshdefense.com/vehicles/mtvr/ . Please correct me if I am wrong about this. Hard enough to keep track of the genealogies of MAN and TATRA military trucks....:)

I've then wondered why Earthroamer, GXV, Tiger, etc. haven't considered using an MTVR as a "base chassis" for their campers? As you seem to be suggesting, it's available in an older, surplus version as the M934, and it's also available new in a civilian version. Oshkosh has a Fire-truck subsidiary, “Pierce” manufacturing, that sells an off-road capable vehicle called the "Hawk Extreme", which is really just a civilian version of the MTVR – see http://www.piercemfg.com/en/trucks/by-purpose/wildland.aspx and http://www.piercemfg.com/PierceMfg/...rature/PDFs/15549_HawkEX_sellsheet_lowres.pdf .


WildlandTruck.jpg HawkExtreme3.jpg




However, as near as I can tell this Fire-truck's frame is not stiff and torsion-free, and the huge water tank in back seems to mount on a pivoting subframe. From the pdf sell-sheet:

Torque box-style construction with spring mounted to chassis frame rails; full support of water tank floor area; storage for folding tank or long equipment integrated into torque box.

I am not sure about this. But if so, then an MTVR 6x6 is not really comparable to a MAN-KAT, SX-44 6x6, or Tatra 815, because the latter all have frames that are comparatively speaking torsion-free.

Do you know whether the frame of the M934 is torsion-free?


*******************************

1. Oshkosh Medium Tactical Vehicles



With all that said, if you've read the rest of the thread you'll know that I am not opposed to CBE, and I can see much to recommend it. I am probably more sympathetic to CBE-designs like the M934 than the majority of those on ExPo who've demonstrated interest in larger expedition vehicles.

Like you, I also wonder why some of Oshkosh's lighter 6x6 trucks are not more frequently repurposed as civilian off-road motorhomes. Or put another way, I wonder why the United States has not generated companies comparable to UniCat and ActionMobil, secondary manufacturers who might create larger, 6x6 mobile homes based on Oshkosh ex-military or civilian chassis, like the “Hawk Extreme” just described above. Earthroamer, GXV, and Tiger do exist, of course, but almost all of their product offerings are variants of the 4x4 truck-camper format – see http://earthroamer.com , http://globalxvehicles.com/vehicles/ , and http://www.tigervehicles.com .

Width is not an issue, because if you look at the detailed product sheets, even the HEMTTs are generally 2.438 m wide, i.e. no wider than a MAN-KAT or an HX/SX – see http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/m977a4-cargo-truck/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HEMTTA4_Cargo_SS_6-13-11.pdf , http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/m1120a4-lhs/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HEMTTA4_LHS_SS_6.13.11.pdf , http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/m978a4-fuel-servicing-truck-tanker/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HEMTTA4_FuelServicing_SS_6-13-11.pdf . Even the HEMTT variant that carries Patriot missiles is only 2.438 m wide – see http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/m983a4-patriot-tractor/#overview , and http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/m985a4-guided-missile-transporter-gmt/ .

Of course HEMTTs have four axles, and so they are much too long. And there is all that stuff in the “Define America” thread about HEMTTs being ill-suited for expedition-style, “lone-ranger” kinds of off-road travel – again, see http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/48137-Hemtt-Define-America-Project . HEMTTs only seem suited for serious off-road travel when in convoy.

More relevant seems to be Oshkosh's “Medium Tactical” line-up of vehicles like the MSVS, FMTV, and the MTVR – see http://oshkoshdefense.com/products/medium-tactical-vehicles/ and http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/MediumTacVeh_Bro_3-23-2011.pdf . Again, the MSVS is an 8x8, so it's too big – see http://oshkoshdefense.com/vehicles/msvs-smp/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/MSVS-SMP_Brch_6pgSingle_LowRes_5.13.14.pdf . But the FMTV and MTVR both come in 6x6 variants, and both seem comparatively light.

For the FMTV, see http://oshkoshdefense.com/vehicles/fmtv/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/FMTV_Bro_9-29-2011.pdf , http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/cargo-4x4-6x6/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/FMTV_Cargo_SS_6-13-11.pdf , http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/5-ton-tractor/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/88-ton-lhs/ , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/FMTV_LHS_SS_6-13-11.pdf , http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/10-ton-dump/ , and http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/FMTV_Dump_SS_6-13-11.pdf :


FMTV-88Ton-LHS-1.jpg FMTV-88Ton-LHS-2.jpg FMTV-Cargo4x4-1.jpg
FMTV-10Ton-Dump-2.jpg FMTV-10Ton-Dump-1.jpg FMTV-2.jpg


************************************

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
.
 
Last edited:

biotect

Designer

biotect

Designer
.
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

************************************



MTVR-MK29-MK30-2.jpg MTVR-MK29-MK30-3.jpg
MTVR-9.jpg MTVR-MK23-MK25-2.jpg
MTVR-MK27-MK28-2.jpg MTVR-MK27-MK28-1.jpg


Oshkosh even makes a somewhat strange, four-axle variant of the MTVR, with one axle forward, and the other three in the rear – see http://oshkoshdefense.com/variants/165-ton-load-handling-system-8x8/#overview , http://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/MTVR_LHS_8x8_SS_6-13-11.pdf :


MTVR-165-Ton-LHS-2.jpg MTVR-165-Ton-LHS-1.jpg


The MTVR reminds me of the Iveco “Musonis” used by Beppe Tenti's Overland 12 expedition, that drove the entire length of Africa and back – see http://www.expeditionportal.com/for...pedition-RV-w-Rigid-Torsion-Free-Frame/page24 (standard ExPo pagination):


dormitorio.jpg officina.jpg


For non-Oshkosh websites with articles about the MTVR, see http://www.army-technology.com/projects/oshkosh-medium-tactical-vehicle-replacement-mtvr/ , http://www.military-today.com/trucks/oshkosh_mtvr.htm , http://www.military.com/equipment/medium-tactical-vehicle-replacement-mtvr , http://www.deagel.com/Military-Trucks/MTVR_a000033001.aspx , http://olive-drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_mtvr.php , http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product2207.html , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_Tactical_Vehicle_Replacement , http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=137 , and http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/mtvr.htm .

And for non-Oshkosh websites with articles about the FMTV, see http://www.ausa.org/publications/armymagazine/archive/2013/05/Documents/SoldierArmed_May2013.pdf , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Medium_Tactical_Vehicles , http://www.military-today.com/trucks/m1083_mtv.htm , http://www.military-today.com/trucks/m1078_lmtv.htm , http://www.military.com/equipment/family-of-medium-tactical-vehicles-fmtv , http://olive-drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_fmtv.php , http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2010tactical/PMFeb9ShaneFullmerMTV.pdf , http://www.army-guide.com/eng/product3689.html , http://www.bga-aeroweb.com/Defense/FMTV.html , http://www.deagel.com/Military-Trucks/MTV-A1_a001807002.aspx , http://www.deagel.com/Military-Trucks/LMTV-A1_a001807001.aspx , http://www.deagel.com/Military-Trucks/Global-Tactical-Vehicle_a001807003.aspx , http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/wsh2013/104.pdf , http://www.engineeringtv.com/video/Oshkosh-FMTV-with-TerraMax-UGV;AUVSI-Unmanned-Systems-2010 , http://tanknutdave.com/the-fmtv-truck-family/ , http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/fmtv.htm , http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/fmtv-2010-2015-oshkosh-wins-the-re-compete-05744/ , http://investor.oshkoshcorporation....403&p=irol-newsArticle2&ID=1591102&highlight= , http://www.fool.com/investing/gener...ns-yet-another-defense-contract-for-fmtv.aspx , http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/12...rue&myArticles_show=true&myArticles_open=true , http://www.deagel.com/news/US-Army-Orders-370-Additional-FMTV-Vehicles_n000004279.aspx , http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=awYwexxlk0Bs , http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2014/05/army-fmtv-order.html , http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/12/21/oshkosh-fmtv-price-unbelievable-bae/ , http://www.slideshare.net/jhasik/dirm-2011-02-oshkosh , http://www.armytimes.com/article/20110120/NEWS/101200329/Oshkosh-delivers-first-FMTV-Wis-Guard , and http://seekingalpha.com/article/367811-oshkosh-takes-a-blow-from-planned-defense-budget .

Here are some short video-clips of the MTVR and FMTV in motion:


[video=vimeo;70788577]http://vimeo.com/70788577[/video]

Note that BAE systems used to produce the FMTV, but production was transferred to Oshkosh after a competitive bidding process in 2009 that was controversial. So some of the videos above are for the BAE systems FMTV, because these seem more available on the web.

Unfortunately, none of these videos provides the kind of footage that would definitively demonstrate whether or not the MTVR and FMTV frames twist. In some of them a degree of twisting seems detectable, but not obvious. However, again, if the FMTV and MTVR do not have torsion-free box-frames that are very rigid, then they are really not in the same "league" as MAN-KAT, Rheinmetall-MAN SX-series, or Tatra 815 series trucks.

Any suggestions as to how to find out whether or not the FMTV and MTVR have very rigid, torsion-free frames?

Incidentally, for a wonderful chart of schematics that seems to cover the full range of American military vehicles, see http://dc355.4shared.com/doc/uTax-FZ1/preview.html .


************************************

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
185,949
Messages
2,880,147
Members
225,627
Latest member
Deleman
Top