jasmtis
Member
You can't see the passenger side tires from the driver's seat of a Tacoma or Jeep just like I can't with my Ram. If things are tight, we are all relying on a passenger or spotter to tell us what's on that side. There's no doubt that these trails are easier in narrower vehicles, but I'm just saying that the difference is significantly smaller than it seems from the driver's seat. Wheelbase is a whole other animal though. My wheelbase is almost 10" longer than a crew long bed Tacoma. But then I could go over a lot of these passes with the weight of a Tacoma in my bed...haha.
The mental aspect of the tapering hood of Jeeps is a very real thing, however.
True and nothing replaces a spotter in technical terrain. Still, better visibility makes for a more fun and confidence inspiring experience on the trails. You can't get around geometry. On steep, narrow forest roads in the Cascades in my Tacoma I'll often come over a crest and not be able to see anything of the trail. We aren't talking about technical terrain here, and I when I stick my head out of the window or step out to see what's ahead it's always a perfectly passable forest road, as I would've assumed, but from the driver seat for all I know it's washed out or literally gone. This never happens in my Range Rover Classic, with a large greenhouse and short, low hoodline. The blind spot in front of a full size truck with an even longer and wider hood will plain and simply create a larger blind area preventing you from picking having the best view of what's coming. Can it make it through 95% of what a Tacoma can? Yes! Is the visibility and size difference between an HD and my Tacoma proportionally similar to the visibility and size difference between my Tacoma and my Range Rover? Also yes, which just doesn't sound like a fun experience to me but if you enjoy it knock yourself out.
You have to trust your spotter. That's even true of a buggy. It usually takes a while 'wheeling with people to get on the same wavelength but when you do your ability to get through stuff goes up leaps and bounds.
Very true! I just always have way more fun when I can see. It doesn't remove the need for a spotter, but it makes for a better experience.
1st gen...so it is a bit smaller than the 2nd/3rd gen. However the interior bed dimensions are a smidge bigger than the later models. Which doesn't make much sense on Toyota's part...why increase the size of the truck if you're not going to make the cargo area bigger? Gained a little cab interior room but not much, fuel economy is about the same, payload went down...since the truck got heavier. I don't like the late model Tacomas for that very reason. Might was well get a half ton at that point. Cost is the same, fuel economy is a touch better, and can be ordered with up to a 3000 lbs payload (F150) if you spec it right.
Here in Idaho it is super easy to plate a bike. One of the reasons we moved here, the other is lots of places to explore right out the front all within 1-3 hour drive, so really no need to drive-camp-drive-camp-drive. Yesterday I was in Cascade...this weekend I was invited to go to McCall, the weekend after that heading to Stanley. Trying to head to the Oregon coast...but can't bring myself to do that 10 hour drive. Looks like am sticking around here for the next couple few weekends, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Used to wheel my F250 harder than any of my Toyotas, and that was back in PA, where it is super tight and greasy. Beat the living **** out of that poor truck. Ended up breaking the frame in half...that truck did not have an easy life. Started going down the same road with my Toyotas of wheeling them hard...but it got to the point where I got tired of breaking stuff...then trying to fix it before having to get back to work on Monday. So I started buying trail toys, ATC's Quads, Dirt Bikes, Mountain Bikes...so much more fun than wheeling trucks...and when you break them. You stick them in the corner of the garage until you can get to it.
Wonder how many guys who buy vehicles to fit down some trail....wonder what the actual percentage of trail use it gets? Guessing most people's truck gets used more running them back and forth to work than anything. I know mine does.
Yep, all good points. I wanted a manual transmission and proper stock capability with a decent aftermarket and on the newer side because I drive a ton. I'd rather have a new first-gen double cab with a stick shift but that is not a thing that exists. Being able to tow my Rover on occasion is nice, but it's not something I do often. It's within my Tacoma's rating and I don't really feel the need to go above and beyond on the tow rating for something I do very occasionally. A full size wouldn't fit in my garage and I live in a city so it would make street parking even more of a pain. Also, the Rover can sit in the corner of my garage till I get to it, it was cheaper than any side by side you can find, I can sleep in the back of it and it's street legal.
Of course it spends more time driving me to work but it wouldn't do a better job of that if it were larger. How many people drive a full size to work every day because they tow their boat from their garage to the slip in April, to the lake for a weekend or two over the summer and back to the garage in October? What's more silly?
Where in PA did you live? I spent some time in the Lehigh Valley. The PNW is really the best for free, accessible exploration with trails of any difficulty you desire.