Flounder,
Curious...what's the sales pitch on the difference between or need for full suspension vs. hard tail?
thanks man!
How much money ya got in them pockets? :costumed-smiley-007
Seriously, the dollar amount weeds out most potential full sus buyers. If you can't wiggle over that $1500 mark, finding a full suspension bike worth a darn becomes a tough search. It usually means you shop the bikes of opportunity for a good deal. Keep in mind, the MSRP for a mid ranch fork is $500-$700, so finding one attached to a $1500 bike is not easy.
The real deciding factor boils down to riding style and terrain. Using me as an example: Here in Prescott, the land of fast and relatively smooth trails, I end up passing dual-boingers all day long. There's just little to dual-boing over. When I take my hard tail to brutal trails like Rock Stacker in Moab, those same dual-boinger guys get to watch me nearly kill myself as I navigate dozens of 2' drops. I can do it, but it ain't easy, and for me it isn't even fun.
I also have ZERO desire to hurl my carcass 10 feet in the air screaming "MMMMmmmountain Dewwwww." I like to go fast and far, don't shy away from super rugged singletrack, but my joy doesn't come from massive air, drops the size of a 401k, or other such potential bone breakers. For me it's more fun to go hard and fast, hit some small jumps, carve some turns and put in some miles. So...hard tail. If I make more trips to Rock Stacker, I'll go buy another full suspension bike (I've owned at least a dozen), but since I don't enjoy that riding, I probably never will.
Riding style and terrain available usually steer people to a particular bike. I should also mention I have a good buddy who ripped down Rock Stacker on a fully rigid singlespeed, so ability and desire play a part. I'm sure some dude has taken a lifted Subaru over the Rubicon as well.
I'll continue my work on the simple answer for future questions.
