1955 land rover

roostercruiser

Adventurer
i currently own a 87 burban but always loved the early rovers. how expensive are they in decent shape and what to look for. and do they make a aftermarket parts for them? any info would be nice.
 

I Leak Oil

Expedition Leader
1955 would make it a series 1. Can be tough to find new parts for, used parts probably a little easier. Some later SII, IIa and III parts will work. Not much aftermarket support from the usual vendors. Most aftermarket support is from the cottage industry types. That's the best type anyway!
Got any rover porn on the truck you're looking at?
 

meatblanket

Adventurer
1955 would make it a series 1. Can be tough to find new parts for, used parts probably a little easier. Some later SII, IIa and III parts will work. Not much aftermarket support from the usual vendors. Most aftermarket support is from the cottage industry types. That's the best type anyway!
Got any rover porn on the truck you're looking at?

x2. Post pics if you have them. I've got a few spare parts around, not too many Series 1 folks in Denver but there are some.

The Series 1s have some advantages over the later rovers, e.g., galvanized door frames, lift off door hinges, and body work that is less likely to get damaged off road.
 

Wander

Expedition Leader
22K for a rusty series would be a very high price no matter what year (except maybe a 48). That's nearly Defender money. Are you looking for a 55 or just a series Rover?
 

meatblanket

Adventurer
Bizarre. I live in Golden and have a Series 1, and actually drive it. I didn't know there were any others around town.

$22k is nuts unless it is concours example.
 

roostercruiser

Adventurer
a series rover. i want something smaller than my burban. i had a 78 scout but lost it in divorce
0620092026.jpg

i like the soft top i put on it
0531091839_0001.jpg


but i want something more unique thats why i leaning toward the series rovers
 

evilfij

Explorer
IMHO, a series I is an enthusiast only truck -- at least one that still has all the stock or most of the stock parts. The biggest issues are that 80" and 86" and non-diesel 88" trucks have the IOE motor which is expensive to rebuild. 88" 2.0 litre diesel motors don't exist anymore (I have seen one, and it blew up), but can be easily replaced by a 2.25 litre petrol or diesel out of an SII/SIIa/SIII/early 90/110. Body panels are tough to come by, master cylinders don't exist in nature anymore and there are a bunch of odd parts that are hard (but not impossible) to find.

If it is your first land rover, look for a Series II or IIa or III or just get another scout. I enjoyed my 1978 Scout II and, unlike a series truck, the 345 V8 allowed the scout to be highway capable.
 
Yes indeed. However I was referring specifically to Series 1s, not later models.

Ah, sorry.

I think Paul Donohue has a S1 somewhere out there...could be faulty brain function though.

The closest one that I know is Slade's...and it's barely S1 any more :)

Having had the little red truck in my garage since last summer, I have to agree with Mr. FJ...it's a little quirky for everyday. A hoot on sunny dry weekends though :sombrero:

"Second" for the IIa suggestion. Our 109 (regular) makes a dandy do-it-all truck.
 

Wander

Expedition Leader
thrice on the IIa-IMHO it offer the most rover-ness per dollar and is much easier to find parts for, etc. With on OD they can approach 60 with glacial like voracity and they are mules on the trail.
 

meatblanket

Adventurer
Ah, sorry.

I think Paul Donohue has a S1 somewhere out there...could be faulty brain function though.

Paul has a IIa 109 Dormie. If he has a SI, it's a well guarded secret.;)

For the OP, I agree with what most folks are saying regarding the SI. It's just easier to maintain SII and later Land Rovers. As a result, a whole bunch of SII and newer parts have found their way into my SI.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
190,282
Messages
2,925,975
Members
233,678
Latest member
xander69
Top