Search results

But there’s not valve train issues.

Did I say it was [emoji23][emoji1787]

All of those are not as big a deal as you are making them out to be. If you really owned as many as you claim you’d know this.

Ok ford fanboy [emoji1787]

Damn second million mile tundra

Umm tundras are nit breaking axles nor have braking issues.

Toyota stand by its product and is fixing it. To claim that other manufacturers do not have rust issues is insane.

Wish these guys would go troll the same forum in the Ford board.

There’s 600000 mile 5.7s out there

I wonder how unimogs get buy with coils.

I mean it’s not really that slow.

Ok so tell that to everyone claiming you’re gonna die in it all of a sudden [emoji1787]

You’re not either. If the test is exactly the same. The truck shouldn’t perform worse. So if it Was safe 3 years ago I’m not all of a sudden going to die in an accident because another truck does better.

So if 100 is perfect and the tundra scored 100. It’s perfect. Just because something scored a 106 doesn’t mean the score of 100 is less than what it was.

[emoji849]

You keep buying them but yet you keep down talking them. Interesting.

His history of disgust for the tundra is well documented. He more trolls these threads than helps

What test performance?

Super sweet. If only it was a 416. Good luck with sale.

Far from a troll [emoji849]. The explain how over time it did worse at the exact same test it at one time did good at. Others improving shouldn’t effect the outcome of the tundra.