Search results

Sure about that?

D1/RRC/Defender for sure. But I think you're right about the D2's because of the funky D2 hubs. One more reason I hate D2's.

Oh, I'm not saying it could not be done. You can do anything. You can even shave that monstrous tater plow Sal's down a bit. But by the time you're done, you may as wall have installed a Spider9. I guess the bottom line is you can keep your truck looking stock, have a stronger set-up, and...

They all cracked between the inner bead "bump" and the outter bead seat, not at the lugs/hub. They were the "Deep Dish" style found on the D1's. I suspect this type damage came from either side-loading the wheel or grinding the wheel into the rocks with the weight of the truck bearing down. Who...

I guess I should be a little more clear. It is only common to fit a Sal's to the rear. Putting a Sals in the front is neither cost justifiable or an upgrade. There are at least three variations of the front Sal's axles; coil, leaf, and the 101. There is one more Sal's that was made that was a...

This makes no real sense at all. A Sal's only fits the back. You're stil left with a pretty crappy front diff. Besides, the Sal's stock axles are pretty weak. You still have to upgrade the axle shafts. By the time it's said-and-done, all you have is a tater plow.

Wow.

I don't know about the D2 rims, but the D1 alloys did crack. I've had three crack and I'm sure if I dug deep enough I could provide pictures (have posted them before in forums). It still does not keep me from running alloys, though.

I loved the TT in snow. I can't say it's any better than the ARB I have in the front now, but the TT did very well for me. However, I value the ARB over the TT for my use of the truck. But IMO, there is nothing at all wrong with a TT. A TT does affect the handeling of the vehicle, though...