2004 freelander

baja dan

Observer
any one got any input on this vehicle it will be mostly commuter good, bad, any thing will be very helpful thanks
 

djbrown01

New member
Bad all bad, keep looking, but that's just my opinion, I haven't seen one break 80 or 90k yet, some cooling system design flaw, Google is your friend

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
 
It seems that the problem is...when the engine or trans die...and they will...there are No Replacements Available. Period.

A client bought one four or five years ago. I told him that he'd better keep a close eye on coolant and trans fluid.

Trip to a football match - the kind with the funny round ball - four little kids in the car - POOF! all the coolant and all the trans fluid were lying on the road.
 

jjstahl3

Explorer
my rover mechanic doesnt even work on them - stay away - he recommends toyota rav 4's over a freelander
 

mhiscox

Expedition Leader
Run away.
Times 2, I'm afraid. I looked into these extensively, liking the size, styling and the reasonable price. But, good grief, what a litany of problems and negative comments. Scared me off, for sure . . . and I don't scare that easily.
 

LtFuzz

Explorer
There's a reason you don't see many Freelanders/LR2s on the road that are older than the current model year...
 

tacr2man

Adventurer
The only one to consider was the diesel version , which IIRC did not go to USA . But all can have probs with viscous unit and in turn the IRD . esp after 70000miles
 

dcwhybrew

Adventurer
My understanding, from talking to the master mechanic at the dealership I use, is the LR2 is profoundly more reliable than the Freelander. The two cant be compared...other than one (FL) is a piece of **** and the LR2 definitely is not. The LR2 seems nice; I have driven it as a loaner. I just wish it had more rear "boot" space and more space in the center.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,595
Messages
2,907,562
Members
230,759
Latest member
Tdavis8695
Top