2006 DC Tundra. DD meets ongoing tinkering.

smokeysevin

Re-redoing things the third time
So...its chop chop time then I assume. Love durtracs, I run both studded and regular on my work truck. Absolutely awesome in the snow. Everyone talks about the sidewall being weak but I've never had a problem even driving over slash piles and up old winter roads full of logging debris. I've cut a few open but on shale roads right after they were graded (I haven't found a tire yet that's immune to that...even bias ply TSLs)

I agree completely, they were super quiet too (until I blew a LCA bushing and jacked my alignment up)

Mine have been airborne a few times too with no complaints.

Sean
 

wrenchMonkey_

Adventurer
So...its chop chop time then I assume. Love durtracs, I run both studded and regular on my work truck. Absolutely awesome in the snow. Everyone talks about the sidewall being weak but I've never had a problem even driving over slash piles and up old winter roads full of logging debris. I've cut a few open but on shale roads right after they were graded (I haven't found a tire yet that's immune to that...even bias ply TSLs)

Yes, chop chop time. Talked with SCS, the new 17x9 F5's should be in next week, so I'll have them start of Dec. Gives me time to mount then up. I am off Dec 10-Jan 4 so I'll be doing this then.
My winter tires are some Nokian Hakka LT2 Studded 265/75-16, which, in a word are, amazing. I was thinking about maybe selling the Nokians, but I know I'd miss them.

Also, tire mountain!
20161107_185233.jpg
 

wrenchMonkey_

Adventurer
What a PITA to weld those top brackets on. Looking back, I might have done it the other way, weld the L fish plates onto the legs then weld the whole assembly on, however, for a non production slider, IE no jigs or anything, I enjoyed doing it this way as I was able to move it around and tweak it, alot...

Also, final weight. 62.5ish lbs per.

20161111_153413.jpg

20161111_154632.jpg

20161111_154912.jpg

20161111_155414.jpg
 
Last edited:

tyv12

Adventurer
Nice, looking forward to the tubbing, I've got some 35s sitting in the shed waiting for time to hack up the firewall
 

GasCan

Observer
That looks awesome. Main reason I did bolt on was I didnt think I could do a good job welding in crazy positions, and cleaning off the rust recall undercoating.

Looking forward to the tubbing!

You know...If you are gonna do one....you may as well do two!!

I cant remember, have you regeared?

GC
 

wrenchMonkey_

Adventurer
That looks awesome. Main reason I did bolt on was I didnt think I could do a good job welding in crazy positions, and cleaning off the rust recall undercoating.

Looking forward to the tubbing!

You know...If you are gonna do one....you may as well do two!!

I cant remember, have you regeared?

GC


Thanks! Ya, it was a bit tough, but I got abut 80% of the area was easily welded, the last 20%, some spots were defiantly tough to get into.

I am looking forward to it aswell. Wheels are shipping on the 21st, should take a week or so to get them. Gives me time to mount/balance and then I go on leave from 10DEC through 3 JAN. I am hoping to get both the tub and the front bumper knocked out during that time.

Haha.... talk to me after its all said and done. Not out of the question tho.

Not yet. I actually got under the truck, and while I was hoping for the random 4.10's that some people have, I have 3.91's. I am really not driving the truck that much these days. Just taking the car to get to work and dropping the fiance off on the way. I'll see how the power loss and fuel economy hits from the 35's. From everything I've read, I don't see it being that bad. The extra 40+ HP from the VVTI 2UZFE should give me an advantage over the early year guys with the AC (Seanpistol/Rickashay) If I hate it, I'll pony up the $ for 4.56 re-gear and ARB rear. However, that money, I'd much rather spend on rearshocks/leaf pack/ u bolt flip/timbren bumps.
 

GasCan

Observer
Are you gonna do your own front bumper?

I just made a little trip to Montana to pick up something at the Montana shipping company.

GC
 

theBullfrog125

Adventurer
Never underestimate regearing. The truck will be so much more enjoyable to drive in its optimum powerband. Also, it will feel like more of a pig the more weight you add.
 

smokeysevin

Re-redoing things the third time
I have a complete third member boxed up with 4.56s and a TRD kazuma limited slip if you are interested.

Sean
 

wrenchMonkey_

Adventurer
So, 35's are heavy. The brakes on the 1st Gen Tundra, are, in a word, OK. Since my truck is a 06, I already have the 13WL calipers, the larger caliper/rotor combo that alot of Tacoma and pre 04 Tundra owners upgrade to.

As much as Id' like to do the StopTech BBK upgrade, at $2000ish, I can think of alot of other places that money could be more effectively used.

I have no idea what pads/rotors are on the truck at the moment, but the thicknesses are good and I am not gonna change parts just for the sake of changing parts. The rear drums I did about a year ago, changed the shoes, drums and hardware kit, everything but the brake cylinders.

Everyone with a 1st Gen Tundra knows how much of a PITA it is to get the star adjusters just perfect. Lightly dragging on the drum, but not too much. Once click to far and your pulling the drum off to reset them. I've dinked around with them before and got it to where I was happy. I also did a full bleed of the brake system to get some new DOT 3 fluid in. That helped with pedal feel and brake fade and would recommend it to anyone.

However, I still feel there's a bit left in the brakes that I can squeek out.

The LSPV/BV, or Load Sensing Proportioning Valve / Bypass Valve, is a system that I think was invented with the best intentions in mind, however, in my eyes, always seemed kinda of gimicky.
The LSPV/BV, for those that don't know, looks like this. (Not my Tundra)
yota22.jpg


It has two jobs. One, when you put weight in the bed, the distance between the bed and axle decreases causing the angle of that metal rod to change, which in turn will open up a valve in the LSPV/BV, allowing more fluid to flow to the rear wheel cylinders, increasing the brake bias from front to rear and giving you more rear braking power. It has three brake fluid lines. An inlet feed like that comes from the ABS module, a return line that doubles back and hooks back up into a T fitting under the brake booster and the axle/wheel cylinder line that feeds your rear drums.

Sounds awesome! However, when you start lifting vehicles, changing around leaf springs and other stuff, the valve wont do its job properly. Also, over time, it will get jammed up and rusty as things always do, and wont't move as freely. The guy before me that put the lifting blocks under the leafs also put a bracket on the axle end of the rod to relocate it up 3 inches. This relocation bracket, or piece of flat bar with 4 holes in it, is sold as the best way to "to keep the geometry" the same. But ya, I question it....

The second job of the LSPV/BV, is the second part of the name, the Bypass Valve. Since the LSPV is allowing different amounts of fluid/pressure to go through to the rear wheel cylinders, the fluid that is not needed on the rear brakes is "Bypassed" and sent back to engine bay and into the front brake loop.

So, how to go about removing the LSPV/BV? A common solution to this problem is to install a manual brake proportioning valve, and, we can go about this two ways.

Option 1) A valve like this , Willwood 260-12627 , $50. Single Inlet and Single Outlet. But you say, Scott! I have 3 lines going to my LSPV, and that only has two! How can we make it work? Well, easy enough. In your engine bay, under your brake MC, by the brake booster, is a T fitting. This is where the return line fitting comes back into, and feeds the front brake loop. If you pop this off, plug it with a 10MMx1 fitting, you've isolated that line and now have a simple two line setup with no return. Then hook the OEM Toyota into the Inlet and the Axle/Wheel Cylinder line to the Outlet, and there ya go.
260-10922-lg.jpg


Option 2) A valve like this , Wilwood , 260-11179, $90. Made for front and rear brakes. The rear circuit has a single inlet and single outlet with the adjustable proportioning valve. The front circuit has a single inlet with two outlets. It can be run as a single outlet with one outlet plugged, or used to split the plumbing on its way to the front calipers. This one is a bit nicer, and comes with a brake light switch you don't need, but you can take that off and plug it.

To use this one, you can plug the Rear Input and Rear Output ports. Run the OEM Toyota Input line into "Front Input", run the OEM Toyota Return Line into the "Front Outlet" and then hookup the line going to the rear axle/wheel cylinders from the Front Outlet. This way, you don't have to deal with capping off the T fitting in the engine bay, however, since Toyota uses 10MMx1 fittings, and this is 3/8-24, there will be some creative use of adapters aswell as some re-flaring of lines to switch them from bubble to inverted flare.

260-11179-lg.jpg


Both have some advantages and disadvantages. I guess this is me thinking out loud. Maybe someone will find this useful.

Another reason for this, is that sometime in the future, after the shackle flip kit/new leaf pack, I'll be cutting the rear tire carrier out, bracing the frame with some 2in DOM and making some custom behind the axle shock mounts to stuff in a 2.5x10 KING smoothie w/ reservoir.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
188,417
Messages
2,907,055
Members
230,176
Latest member
Arcadia1415
Top