Toyota does not offer a vehicle that compares with the capability and features of a Wrangler - a Tacoma is not a suitable alternative in my opinion and 4runners are ugly and outrageously expensive. FJ Cruisers are no longer in production, and were also horribly ugly and expensive. In fact, government regulations have killed every other legitimate 4wd backcountry SUV other than the Wrangler. This cylinder head problem does not appear to be a design issue, but a manufacturing process defect.
FWIW, a friend of mine bought a brand new Toyota Tundra in '08. He had many, many warranty claims for transmission shifting problems, transfer case wouldn't shift into 4wd, and other weird electronic issues. I bought a '93 Toyota pickup in '96 with 30K miles and had clutch problems, exhaust leaks, and oil leaks. I'm not convinced about Toyota quality myself.
I'm NOT bashing Toyota, no doubt they are good quality and engineering, but I just don't see the magic compared with other manufacturers. I've constantly had a Nissan WD21/22 truck / SUV in my garage for the past 20 years - currently a mildly modded '01 Xterra with 200K miles that I've had for 10 years - and they are the most reliable vehicles I've ever owned. One of my previous trail trucks was an '87 Pathfinder with 280K miles, ran perfect, and I only sold it because I wanted an open top Jeep (I bought and rebuilt a junkyard CJ5).
The so-called 'poor engineering' of Jeep Wranglers is a myth - the 'engineering failures' mentioned in all the forums are induced by radical modifications (35+" tires) and extreme off road use. Jeep engineers are not going to design a vehicle based on 37" off road tires, lockers, and diving off of 8' rock ledges, but yet that's what the Jeep forum junkies expect. The usual Toyota Tacoma or FJ Cruiser that I see on the trail is mildly modified, only a moderate increase in tire size, and is used in a less extreme manner. Just my 2 cents.