islandthymetaco
Observer
The LC wasn't specifically designed for overlanding; it's a solid platform that can serve as an overland rig. The same applies for other pickup's and SUV's. And believe it or not, there are many overlanders who prefer 3/4 ton's for their added utility, especially when it comes to carrying a bed camper or heavy payloads. You should take some time to step out of your Toyota bubble and go converse with some overlanders in the Domestic and Full-sized section; apparently none of them got the memo that their vehicles aren't well suited to overlanding.
My problem with the 10x number is that you're claiming it's fact. How do you even begin to verify an opinionated statement like that? These are the types of shallow, mindless arguments that fanboys tend to make.
All of those other subjective judgments (in bold) will vary from one person to the next. The newer domestic pickup's are very well built and quite luxurious, by truck standards, IMHO. They also are designed for much higher workloads than your average Toyota vehicle, because they are first and foremost work vehicles. I'm stating my view on this, and there is no point in arguing over personal opinions. But I will say that Chrysler makes the only two 4x4 vehicles in North America with solid front and rear axles and locking differentials (Power Wagon and Wrangler); in my mind, that counts for a lot as an overland-oriented vehicle. Toyota's LC lineup is good, but it doesn't have those features from the factory, at least not in North America.
This just proves my point. You talk about how LC vehicles are better than their domestic counterparts, which is a subjective statement in and of itself, and your primary reference for that "fact" are the anecdotal experiences of members on a LC-focused forum. I'm not seeing any facts here. You really need to get out of your Toyota bubble and learn to appreciate that there are other vehicles when it comes to overlanding.
I don't think anyone here is whining about or deriding the LC; any derogatory tone that you can detect on my part is directed purely at some of the LC owners who get a little full of themselves.
And by the way, if you want to give some facts, start with giving a link to a Toyota website or document that specifically states that LC's have a 25 year service life. I'm amazed by how much I've seen that "fact" regurgitated here and elsewhere, and yet for all of my google searching, I've never seen it in Toyota's own literature.
All the things you've suggested me to do imply that you haven't actually read any of my comments. I'm not a Toyota fanboy, I'm just trying to explain why that's the attitude you get in the LAND CRUISER section of this forum.
All you've done this entire thread is try and pick arguments with Land Cruiser owners since their comments get you so worked up. As I said in a previous post, id take the 250 over the 200 series.
You keep bringing up new domestic trucks, but as I've said, I was referring to the last 20 years including the 80 and 100 series. I still haven't seen you list a single vehicle that are more well made for overlanding (and reliable) than the Land Cruiser. Subjective or not, at this point I'm just asking for your opinion. Name one. One.
Edit: If you can't even name one, your argument is invalid. You're just proving that the fanboys have a reason to back up their subjective claims.