No offense, but seems like a silly comparison. It's like comparing a C series and S series Mercedes, or a Boxter to a 911. The LC is a million + mile, hand built vehicle that is built like a tank. The 4 Runner is awesome, but in a different league. All you have to do is crawl underneath both vehicles to see the difference. With that said... $40K buys LOTS of repairs and goodies. = D
hahahahaha
Those are facts STRAIGHT from toyota.com.
Does the Land Cruiser have more capacity? Yes, in towing. No in GVWR (unless you are willing to roll above GVWR, then yes, probably)
Is the land cruiser more efficient? No
Is the land cruiser more powerful? Yes
Is the land cruiser more heavy duty? Yes.
Will the Land Cruiser last longer? Probably. I'm on 11 years with my 4runner with zero failures. Would a land cruiser be equal? Probably. I would like to see some land cruiser owners who have been driving their trucks for more than 10 years speak up here.
Is the land cruiser worth the 100% price premium? Probably not for most users.
The consensus seems to be that a land cruiser is built for 25 years. Where it gets interesting is that most LC owners on this board seem to buy in 5-12 years into the life cycle. So at the point the value proposition is different.
When my 4runner starts to show signs of wear, my next vehicle will likely be a new 4runner, maybe a used LC or Gx460. Not quite sure.
At what point is heavy duty just heavy?
Do you wear calf high steel toe boots during a 10k?