Pretty sure he's saying that Toyota isn't designing trucks for the 3rd owner who cranks the odo over 200k. At one point, sure maybe. Not anymore.
Sure they are.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well. What I think Land Rover should do is continue to build the Defender, only back-engineer it to, say, 1970 specs. And Toyota should do the same with the Land Cruiser, except that it should be a copy of an FJ-45.
"They can't do that!" you scream. "They couldn't sell them in the U.S. or Europe!" Well, they couldn't sell them as CARS. But let's just suppose...
Let's suppose they sell them as, oh, paperweights, or lawn ornaments. Sell them not as a whole unit, but part by part (just like that Johnny Cash song). And if the buyers of these lawn ornament parts just HAPPENED to put them all together, and the resulting device just HAPPENED to be self-propelled, you couldn't blame LR or Toyota for the misguided actions of its customers, could you?
As for licensing, well, that might be a tad tricky. But we Americans (and you foreign types, too) are nothing if not resourceful. We'll solve that problem right after we finish assembling our lawn ornaments...
Yall are missing the point. I'm not talking about parts support or reliability. That's not designing. I'm talking about the vehicle design.
New Land cruisers don't look like fj40s or wranglers or defenders anymore in the USA. Theyre designed to compete with range rovers, etc.
Toyota doesn't see you buying fj60 replacement parts and think, we should make a truck for the 4x4 enthusiast crowd. But when they see 200,000 wrangler unlimited sales a year, they probably think they're missing out on a lot of sales. The best way to nudge Toyota is to buy a competitors vehicle.
Corporations like Toyota are concerned with next quarter sales. Not 30 year ownership. The reputation that they will last 30 years is just one selling point. If a research firm told them they would make more money throwing reliability to the wind and only making black cars, they'd do it.
The same thing is happening at Land Rover. There is probably one person in Sr. Managment who vouches for legacy. All the Worton MBAs, analysts and consultants running the company could careless. Especially when they're making more money than ever.
"Japanese management is far more stable than US or European management, and that stability allows Toyota’s senior managers to think 5, 10, and even 20 years ahead. Traditionally, US automakers have been focused on this quarter and next quarter … meaning that reliability wasn’t as much of a priority as it should have been. Euro automakers are more stable, but still vulnerable to sudden upheaval and the dramatic shifts in direction that come along with management changes."
http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2...ota-way-in-order-to-be-as-reliable-as-toyota/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I regret even bringing it up. I'm taking about designing for enthusiasts vs soccer moms. Not reliability.
His username is "toyotalandcruiser," did you expect anything less?
I regret even bringing it up. I'm taking about designing for enthusiasts vs soccer moms. Not reliability.
There is - Just start with buying a chassis and go from there - as long as you don't mind the V8 in a disco you can reuse almost all of the engine and driveline. All the parts for defenders are available, some cost more than others (like push button rear doors now cost more than a galvanized chassis).I've always thought there should be an easy way to buy a discovery for $1000 and then buy a conversion kit to make it into a defender 100.