2019 Ford Ranger Taking Orders

Wallygator

Adventurer
Noted.



Like I said, I'm not a fan of the Tundra for a few reasons. I'd rather see the frame fully boxed, but I still think that truck is well-built and very robust in its current form. It can ultimately tow and carry more than the LC 200, so obviously the frame is durable.

Everything else underneath the Tundra is, like I said before, very beefy compared to some other 1/2 tons. I find it interesting too that OEM's like GM and Ford will offer GVWR upgrade packages (which are rated far higher than the Tundra), but they're using the same brakes and axles as the lower-payload variants (which are smaller compared to what is on the Tundra).

Oh yeah I believe the Tundra frame is more than adequate. I guess I didn't convey what I meant in my post. Was only trying to say that a fully boxed frame is probably better than a hybrid style as far as strength goes. The booty bounce part was a joke, hence the smiley face, sorry @DaveInDenver, didn't mean to rile you up.
 

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
Oh yeah I believe the Tundra frame is more than adequate. I guess I didn't convey what I meant in my post. Was only trying to say that a fully boxed frame is probably better than a hybrid style as far as strength goes. The booty bounce part was a joke, hence the smiley face, sorry @DaveInDenver, didn't mean to rile you up.
We likely agree for the most part since I would like to see a fully boxed frame and diesel truck, be it a Hilux or Tacoma. But this topic floats to the top all the time, not much new to be hashed out of it. What Dalko, Clutch, I or any of the other number of people think is or isn't doesn't matter. Toyota isn't going to give us small trucks meant for work anymore so we either cross our fingers that Ford may or we have to build what we want, which is the same as it ever was. I stopped hoping and went through welding school personally.
 

73datsun

Member
I know it's a super petty thing, but love that the Ranger has power folding mirrors. Something I need for my garage and parking downtown. It's one of the key downfalls for the ZR2. Currently no retro-fit or mod kits to power fold mirrors on the Colorado.

Excited to see what the Ranger manages for towing, payload and fuel economy.
 

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
It would be interesting to see the Ram 1500 with coils run that track.
And can't imagine a scenario where Ford might try to figure out the natural frequency of a competitor's chassis and design a proving ground track that happened to exploit it. Not that I'm defending Mike Sweers apparent philosophy of trying to tune a chassis for so-called compliance, which causes this. I've chased a rear end bounce in my Tacoma thinking it was springs or shocks when I probably just found a resonance of the frame. But I'm also not sure this hasn't been true of even the Hilux, my old 1991 had a similar rear end bounce on some roads. It seems our state highway department has a crack joint interval that just makes white, 4x4 XtraCab and Access Cab Toyotas oscillate at the speed I drive.
 
Last edited:

Buliwyf

Viking with a Hammer
I know it's a super petty thing, but love that the Ranger has power folding mirrors. Something I need for my garage and parking downtown. It's one of the key downfalls for the ZR2. Currently no retro-fit or mod kits to power fold mirrors on the Colorado.

Excited to see what the Ranger manages for towing, payload and fuel economy.

Until you knock that mirror off.

They are hardcore $$$ to replace. (assuming F150/250/350 similar pricing)
 

Bayou Boy

Adventurer
And can't imagine a scenario where Ford might try to figure out the natural frequency of a competitor's chassis and design a proving ground track that happened to exploit it. Not that I'm defending Mike Sweers apparent philosophy of trying to tune a chassis for so-called compliance, which causes this. I've chased a rear end bounce in my Tacoma thinking it was springs or shocks when I probably just found a resonance of the frame. But I'm also not sure this hasn't been true of even the Hilux, my old 1991 had a similar rear end bounce on some roads. It seems our state highway department has a crack joint interval that just makes white, 4x4 XtraCab and Access Cab Toyotas oscillate at the speed I drive.

Yup. I had an F150 Screw of that era and the backend of the bed would shake it's butt off with corrugations. I've owned a lot of pickups and never seen one as bad as that Ford.
 

Buliwyf

Viking with a Hammer
I think that's why they made that test road. Only later did they decide to see how other trucks did. There should be a few of those to test different frequencies. And the designers should have done a test on a chassis shaker. But those tests obviously can't always account for real life.
 

Todd780

OverCamper
I always take videos presented by the manufactures with a grain of salt... or a whole shaker of it.

I spent years working for dealerships. If Ford showed a video or even did a test in person.. guess what.... The Ford won. If it was a GM dealer putting it on?... Go figure the GM won... I recall being at an event when the 6.0L diesel came out. Ford set up a drag race with a Duramax. I guess Dodge wasn't invited. The Ford was RCLB and the Duramax was a CCLB loaded leather truck... Seems like an even match.... I'm sure there was no weight difference there at all. :rolleyes:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,355
Messages
2,905,838
Members
230,117
Latest member
greatwhite24
Top