Wallygator
Adventurer
Noted.
Like I said, I'm not a fan of the Tundra for a few reasons. I'd rather see the frame fully boxed, but I still think that truck is well-built and very robust in its current form. It can ultimately tow and carry more than the LC 200, so obviously the frame is durable.
Everything else underneath the Tundra is, like I said before, very beefy compared to some other 1/2 tons. I find it interesting too that OEM's like GM and Ford will offer GVWR upgrade packages (which are rated far higher than the Tundra), but they're using the same brakes and axles as the lower-payload variants (which are smaller compared to what is on the Tundra).
Oh yeah I believe the Tundra frame is more than adequate. I guess I didn't convey what I meant in my post. Was only trying to say that a fully boxed frame is probably better than a hybrid style as far as strength goes. The booty bounce part was a joke, hence the smiley face, sorry @DaveInDenver, didn't mean to rile you up.