A New President! Now What?

SinCityFJC

Adventurer
Written by Del Albright
Thursday, 06 November 2008 01:03
Recreationists Must Unite and Mobilize

By Del Albright, BlueRibbon Ambassador

Recreationists who enjoy the backcountry, waterways, off-pavement trails and SUV exploring have a huge new door of opportunity open to us – as well as a new challenge. The time has never been more critical for us to unite and mobilize to enjoy this new door and meet this new challenge. No matter how you wanted this election to turn out, we have to step up, work together, and mobilize our forces to help this new administration understand our sports and access issues.


Inherent with new Presidents, rotating congress critters, and term limits, we will always be in the game of educating new elected officials. It is our destiny if we are to survive.

I think there are a few steps we can take to ensure the future of our sports, no matter how you view this change in American politics. And one thing is for sure: we can all be proud of the fact that it is America and we can affect change by speaking up and working together. This is not the time to sit by and wait. We must act and help the newly-elected politician at all levels understand that we are the responsible stewards of our public lands and that we deserve access. Here are my suggestions for “now what?”

Step one is to unite our various sports and access interests at every opportunity. Leadership meetings and Summits, intra and inter-state, will help us find new ways to cooperate. Differences must be put aside and past intra-sport conflicts must come to an end. We need an Army now, more than ever. National groups like the BlueRibbon Coalition are an obvious membership for every recreationist in this country because “mixed use” will be an important strategy for keeping trails and riding areas open.

Groups like the North American Motorized Recreation Council (NAMRC) and the new BlueRibbon National Land Use Advisory Council (NLUAC) that facilitate regionalized communication will help us breech gaps in communication and facilitate long-term solutions to local and regional problems, as well as national issues. But no matter who works for us, we all need to be united in our efforts.

Step two is to engage recreationists at all levels to join up and be part of organized recreation. There are millions of us out there waiting for a reason to join up and get involved. This new Administration is the reason. They need us to help them understand who we are and what we stand for.

A quick internet search shows that those who oppose our access outnumber us by well over a million members and hundreds of millions of dollars. Just the numbers for a few key groups are shocking:
The Wilderness Society has over 300,000 members and supporters, with $60 million bucks in the bank.
The Sierra Club with over 730,000 members and over a hundred million dollars in their kitty.
The National Audubon Society with net assets at the end of 2007 at over $300 million and tens of thousands of members.

So why do we have so many off-pavement and waterway recreationists who are not members of something? The reality is that our state, regional and national organizations have not yet found the magic formula to engage all these pending members. I think this election changes that. We all now have reasons to jump in with both feet and to engage our friends and fellow recreationists to turn this door of opportunity into one we’ll never forget. We have to be the solution with our large organizations and become the empowerment to get others to join the cause. Membership in our standing organizations and clubs is absolutely critical to the survival of responsible recreation.

Step three is to adopt more of our public lands and engage with our state and federal land management agencies. We have to partner up with land management agencies at every opportunity and find ways for us to be involved in the use, management and future of those lands and waterways we love to play on. We need to be at the table when decisions are made, problems are identified, and solutions are implemented.

We have to take “ownership” of our resources. Oh, excuse me, we do own America! Let’s not forget that. When it comes to public lands, they are YOUR public lands. So we need to do everything we can to ensure our lands are protected FOR the public instead of FROM the public.

BlueRibbon Coalition is a national recreation group that champions responsible use of public and private lands, and encourages individual environmental stewardship. It represents over 10,000 individual members and 1200 organization and business members, for a combined total of over 600,000 recreationists nationwide. Call 1-800-258-3742 and visit BRC online at www.sharetrails.org. Also visit Del’s website at www.delalbright.com.
 

Scott Brady

Founder
agavelvr said:
Maybe I'm a super minority, but I'm a OHV enthusiast who enjoys hiking, backpacking and mountain biking, I find it hard to support the BRC if they are lobbying for open access to Wilderness areas.

You are certainly not in the minority here.

I also support wilderness areas. Not everything needs a road through it ;)
 

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
expeditionswest said:
You are certainly not in the minority here.

I also support wilderness areas. Not everything needs a road through it ;)
I think the position that BRC takes is sorta the anti-SUWA, anti-Sierra Club. It's not really the preferred alternative, but the actual end balance will be someplace in between the two. So I think it's important to have BRC as long as there's groups who take a starting position that closes darn near every trail. I wish that lobbyists didn't exist, but the reality is that they do and so we need groups who accept both views talking to the power people.
 

dieselcruiserhead

16 Years on ExPo. Whoa!!
I also have problem with a number of Del's statements. I certainly very much respect the man and respect the work he has done.

Del's comments represent to me what is a real old school ideology of thinking which Del has reenforced here in his comments, the "army," the "unite" etc. this is I do not think it is a strategic advantage to unite with ATV users as there are so many of them, due to their limited comfort and range of use they conglomerate in high traffic areas, and because we are "united" as "OHVs" we all take the brunt of it. The wilderness advocates (which are sometimes justified but are also very often not justified) then use these high traffic areas to close access to all vehicles, based on the impact of ATVs or OHVs in high traffic (and often poorly managed) areas. So it is a strategic weakness for vehicle-dependent explorers such as ourselves who actually go to more rural areas beyond the popular 4x4 trails in various locations.

I also support wilderness area in certain locations very much but I have a more shared use approach where there should be more easements and their should be managed areas. I grew up hiking in various Wilderness areas and really repect the protection they created. But the Red Rock Wilderness Act (which I fully admit I have little direct knowledge of) is 11 million acres, it would be a major bummer to lose access to those areas and those trails. And again they are primarily hardly used Jeep tracks with maybe 5 or maybe upto a couple hundred Jeeps running through but really driving through on old dirt tracks. Neither side is correct in their ideologies versus the real impacts.

It is no secret that he and a number of land use leadership have been polarized to the right by ideologically agreeing with oil and gas drilling and other issues that also play in heavily in the debate. Because of this the lines have been blurred and it has become an "us versus them" approach no matter what side you are on. Again it is a weakness because not only do democrats embrace the story/approach they have been told (off road, oil + gas, destruction of these resources) all grouped into the same category. This is our own weakness that we allowed to happen. Basically getting wrapped up in the political fight because the majority of us happen to have these political beliefs. Again, it is our own weakness.
 

dieselcruiserhead

16 Years on ExPo. Whoa!!
I also wanted to say the usual disclaimers apply. I make this arguement often and it almost always draws heat sometimes from some of my closest friends. I am also not heavily involved in the land use debate and am not active with the advocacy groups. But I read heavily on it, I am CC'd on most bulletins and newsletters that at least apply to Utah and I've been a land use officer twice for our local 4WD club. I do believe strongly in keeping these trails open and that management is the solution, not closure.

Kurt's post from the other thread is right on the money and probably the best thing we can do IMO other than writing our congress persons and future President with valid arguements rather than political rhetoric:

This is a real threat. We all want Wilderness too, but the agenda they will push to get it will threaten access to countless "epic" routes throughout Southern Utah. Simple boundary re-alignments and cherry-stemming would prevent many of these issues and the Wilderness would be more widely accepted, sadly SUWA doesn't seem to be open to a compromise of any sorts.

Joining all the motorized advocacy groups is HUGE, but don't stop there. Ask your vendors what they do to support land access, ask them who they support! Ask your fellow club members the same. We can only save access to our hobby through teamwork!
 

Guinness44

Adventurer
Blue Ribbon supports ALL outdoor recreation, on a share the trails base. IF we dont stick together, we all loose. There already are wildernesses out there.
Locally the greens want to make wilderness out of the whole county (well every hill/mountain). One just cannot let this happen. THEY dont own it, they think they do. I have been at plenty of these meetings. (Dona Ana County NM). Bottom line, DO join Blue Ribbon, Tread Lightly, your local 4WD club, or loose this recreation/sport (whatever you call it).

I havent yet driven somewhere, where there is not a secluded place to start the hike from, if thats the goal.
 

FurthurOnTheFly

Glamping Society
agavelvr said:
Maybe I'm a super minority, but I'm a OHV enthusiast who enjoys hiking, backpacking and mountain biking, I find it hard to support the BRC if they are lobbying for open access to Wilderness areas.

expeditionswest said:
You are certainly not in the minority here.

I also support wilderness areas. Not everything needs a road through it ;)

X3 here....obviously working with Disabled Explorers I believe everyone has the right to access to the backcountry, but I echo what Scott said about not needing to drive a road through everything.

Honestly I was really disappointed in my encounter with BRC at the Hump N Bump this past weekend. I was very excited to see their booth and immediately went up to chat with them about things and possibly even join. The lady at the booth (who I later found out to be Del's wife) could barely give me the time of day and all but ignored me when I tried to talk to her about the organization and some of the problems we have been facing with the 4wd community here in AZ. She couldn't even make eye contact with me and it felt like she couldn't wait for me to leave. So I went over to the United Four Wheel Drive Association booth and had a great conversation with them. I haven't given them any of my money yet, but was left with a much better impression than that of the BRC.
 

SinCityFJC

Adventurer
Miss R2FJ said:
X3 here....obviously working with Disabled Explorers I believe everyone has the right to access to the backcountry, but I echo what Scott said about not needing to drive a road through everything.

Honestly I was really disappointed in my encounter with BRC at the Hump N Bump this past weekend. I was very excited to see their booth and immediately went up to chat with them about things and possibly even join. The lady at the booth (who I later found out to be Del's wife) could barely give me the time of day and all but ignored me when I tried to talk to her about the organization and some of the problems we have been facing with the 4wd community here in AZ. She couldn't even make eye contact with me and it felt like she couldn't wait for me to leave. So I went over to the United Four Wheel Drive Association booth and had a great conversation with them. I haven't given them any of my money yet, but was left with a much better impression than that of the BRC.

Stacey Albright of BRC might of just been exhausted after the www.namrc.com conference, SEMA & Hump N Bump all in one week. She was also upset that night since someone had let her kitty out of the MH again & didn't find her cat till sunday afternoon.
 

Scott Brady

Founder
Ufwda

UFWDA is really on the ball at the moment, including a great deal of energy directed at overlanding. I am quite excited to support and work with them.

Look for more details on this in the coming weeks. :)
 

SinCityFJC

Adventurer
expeditionswest said:
UFWDA is really on the ball at the moment, including a great deal of energy directed at overlanding. I am quite excited to support and work with them.

Look for more details on this in the coming weeks. :)

X2 Scott & a lot of the issues/concerns mentioned in this thread by ExPo members were on the agenda of last weeks www.namrc.com conference as well as many chats around the campfires @ Hump N Bump.
 
Last edited:

Guinness44

Adventurer
We dont have to agree: My horses are trained for mountainbikes and other encounters. If people use THAT argument to lock others out?.. are they horsemen/women? I sure hear that enough around here, but that just doesnt cut it. There is trail courtesy for both sides.

AS I SAID Blue Ribbon helps all. well, one more time: IF we dont stick together we are outnumbered. It will be like most of Europe, pavement pounding, and crowded campgrounds. Period. If you think the other side is willing to give: likely thats being said, NOT done.
 

Jonathan Hanson

Well-known member
A quick internet search shows that those who oppose our access outnumber us by well over a million members and hundreds of millions of dollars. Just the numbers for a few key groups are shocking:
The Wilderness Society has over 300,000 members and supporters, with $60 million bucks in the bank.
The Sierra Club with over 730,000 members and over a hundred million dollars in their kitty.
The National Audubon Society with net assets at the end of 2007 at over $300 million and tens of thousands of members.

My wife and I are members (and past board members) of the National Audubon Society.

We have taught natural history writing classes for the Sierra Club.

Shocking, huh?
 

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
Jonathan Hanson said:
My wife and I are members (and past board members) of the National Audubon Society.

We have taught natural history writing classes for the Sierra Club.

Shocking, huh?
Not really. I was a member of the Sierra Club (Eastern Missouri Group) for a short while years ago until people in the local chapter noticed the MTB stickers on my car. They were very arrogant about the whole thing, me being a punk 22 year old kid and all. Telling me how bikes are so bad and how they need to be banned. That struck me wrong and honestly helped push me politically away from them. I dunno if they care, but just about every year since (that was 1993) I have given an extra $25 for that membership equivalent to IMBA above my regular renewal.
 

Scott Brady

Founder
There really is a balance in all of this, though neither side can really see the forest for the trees.

The only reason the environmental groups have any ammunition against us is because of our own OHV users. Every time some knucklehead throws his Bud Lite can out of the window, or an ATV rider tears across the desert, it just emboldens their cause and claim.

It really is them against us, and us against us. Who doesn't want greener forests, bluer water and fewer endangered species?

It is a shame to say it, but the OHV community has a HUGE segment of completely selfish and destructive users. I see it every time I go out on the trail.

Education and enforcement are absolutely necessary for the survival of our hobby. I mean strict enforcement, paid for by us (the gov. has no money for it). Unfortunately, the responsible users will have to pay-up to enforce the irresponsible. There needs to be a consequence for driving off-trail, or for littering. You cannot believe the garbage we come across in the OHV areas north and east of Phoenix. It is the OHV and Hunting/Shooting communities that are responsible for the destruction and trash. I think we should step back and ponder why the environmental left might be so intent on ending our access...
 

taco chaser

Supporting Sponsor
expeditionswest said:
There really is a balance in all of this, though neither side can really see the forest for the trees.

The only reason the environmental groups have any ammunition against us is because of our own OHV users. Every time some knucklehead throws his Bud Lite can out of the window, or an ATV rider tears across the desert, it just emboldens their cause and claim.

It really is them against us, and us against us. Who doesn't want greener forests, bluer water and fewer endangered species?

It is a shame to say it, but the OHV community has a HUGE segment of completely selfish and destructive users. I see it every time I go out on the trail.

Education and enforcement are absolutely necessary for the survival of our hobby. I mean strict enforcement, paid for by us (the gov. has no money for it). Unfortunately, the responsible users will have to pay-up to enforce the irresponsible. There needs to be a consequence for driving off-trail, or for littering. You cannot believe the garbage we come across in the OHV areas north and east of Phoenix. It is the OHV and Hunting/Shooting communities that are responsible for the destruction and trash. I think we should step back and ponder why the environmental left might be so intent on ending our access...
Well said. Form clubs, keep photo logs of trails in your area, do your part to maintain our forests, and report / educate the ignorant if possible. Contact your local ranger districts, make contacts so you know what the pending issue's for each trail/area is so you are not only productive, but effective. All stuff many of you already know....:)
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
188,476
Messages
2,905,633
Members
230,428
Latest member
jacob_lashell
Top