I'll second your truism. It seems kind of obvious when I read it but in all my thinking and research (and maybe even philosophizing) on camper design, I never fully developed the thought. I think this is a perfect philosophical starting point for those out there designing their own camper.
And if Adrift is on the smaller side of the bell curve (it seems large to me but after seeing lots of stuff at OX, I think you're right), I'm waaay out on the tail of the distribution . But your truism holds, our camper is a very small space with most of the usual features and yes, every thing and space has multiple uses and there's lots to deploy. Like you say, with age comes a desire for more comfort and ultimately it all comes down to personal preference, but for me, spending some time getting set up for the night and then being in close quarters with my loved one(s) is kind of what camping is supposed to be like.
Who you calling big? We are definitely on the big side. I tend to think of my rig as the biggest thing you can still do some reasonable offroad traveling in, but I'm guessing some would say we are too big for that as well. We manage to get through some tough stuff, but its work. Was more thinking about what you get when you go bigger yet vs what you lose.
I think there are probably a ton of people in the next size down from our rig, or even in sportsmobiles etc who'd make the same comparison between our rig and theirs, with ours having a bunch of unnecessary space or creature comforts in many peoples mind. So, it really is a continuum of preference.
I will say, I love our rig when its deployed, but it is stressful to drive up those narrow trails in mex. So, I can't really imagine trying to do Baja in something substantially bigger. The other overlanding truism I've heard from people, is nobody ever goes smaller, each progressive rig is bigger than the last, so, maybe don't listen to me
Last edited: